There are far too many unknowns to this question to be able to answer it properly. However, you can take a look at the related question below for inspiration in your decision as to who deserves the blame and who doesn't.
The driver is responsible for hitting the cow. The sign is there to warn drivers to take care in case cows are crossing the road.
the deer
If the dog is on the road when you hit it, it's the dogs owner fault (the dog should bave been restrained).
It is your fault for hitting an object that does not move. The owner of the road can not be held at fault unless he or she created it for the purpose of damaging a car.
You are! For not being cautious when reversing on to a road. You should make sure that it is safe and clear when reversing, if you hit another car it is your fault and not the person that is driving on the roads fault.
you were the at fault driver for the simple fact that you did not have insurance. Which means you should not have been on the road in the first place. If you had'nt been on the road the accident would'nt have happened.
You were on the road so had the right of way. The person in the driveway is at fault. He/she didn't yield. They hit you. You DIDN'T hit them. Remember that if you go to court or talk with insurance.
any vehicle leaving private property and entering a public road ,is at fault. all vehicles leaving private property MUST yield to vehicles on a public road
It depends on where you hit the vehicle. If you hit the first half it's his fault. If you hit the second half it's is partially your fault so you are only compensated for a percentage of your damage. If you hit him in the rear, it's your fault unless he was driving recklessly (speeding, changing multiple lanes etc.)
Yours since the car on the road has the right of way. You actually hit them since they were in the road when you pulled out.
it is illegal to hit a cow in India because the cow is god
You are possibly both at fault. Speeding is negligence per se