Want this question answered?
Prussia was once the most powerful empire of Europe. It was known for its strong military due to unification of different tribes, inclusion of advanced war tactics, dedicated military leaders, and range of weapons.
Prussia and Sparta were similar in the extend that both were powerful in terms of military, Sparta using elite infantry to aid them in battles, and Prussia using strong tactics to win theirs.
A nation cannot protect it's economic strength without a equally strong military. Nations of the free world during the cold war that had strong economic strength but weak or no militaries were successful...only because the US military protected them.
Prussia was once the most powerful empire of Europe. It was known for its strong military due to unification of different tribes, inclusion of advanced war tactics, dedicated military leaders, and range of weapons.
Sending troops to Europe was done for the purpose of creating a strong military in World War 1. There is strength in numbers.
Spartas Strength is the Military, when the boys are first born they put them outside for a night with no food or water and if they lived the were strong and made to be a Warrior for sparta. The Spartans focused on their military and the Athens were more foucused on their Acedemics and worked on military too.
it controled the ruhr valley
there is no differences between strength and strong. Only that strong is a synonym of strength.
Ruhr valley
The kings of Prussia ruled as an absolute monarchy from 1701-1740. A strong army helped the rulers gain power.
prohibiting immigration into prussia
In a word, no. Though Prussia did field small fleets from time to time they were essentially a land power with no naval might to speak of.