The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
The wealthy in Roman society were those who had money. They could be either patrician, plebeian, equite, freedmen or even foreigners.
Patricians
The wealthy landowners spread out with the expansion of Roman territories. Expansion offered new lands to be cultivated and the wealthy landowners took up their opportunities.
because they blew up every roman and stole all there money
The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.
The Nomenklatura made up the new elite in soviet society
B citizens and slaves
The general Roman society was made up of the proletariat. They were the "common people" of the empire, neither patrician, plebeian nor equite. They were mostly freeborn, or freedmen with varying degrees of wealth ranging from very poor to middle class while a few of them, such as imperial freedmen, could be extremely wealthy.
Roman society was divided into the patricians (the aristocracy), the equites (equestrians) who were bankers, money lenders, merchants and investors in shipping and mining, and the plebeians (the commoners). there were also slaves and freedmen
patricians and pleabeians.
The Plebeians made up the majority of the early Roman society. Plebeians were the names of the poorer end of Rome. Patricians was the name for the richer end of Rome.
In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run. In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run. In the Roman Government the Senate was made up of 'Patricians' who are men from wealthy families. The 'Plebeians' were the poor people and they had no say in how their country was run.
For want of a better word, the proletariat made up most of Roman society. These people, the "masses" were freeborn but neither patrician nor plebeian nor equite. They were citizens, but did not fit into any set class.
It depends on the timeframe. In the ancient times, the wealthy Romans made up the horsemen because they could afford it; at that time, the Roman citizens had to form the armies (not mercenaries or conscripted soldiers). Later, though, barbarians made up the bulk of the Roman forces including cavalry.
Sadly, they weren't. The entire Roman government was made up of wealthy white Roman males who owned land. Much like America in the 1700's
The wealthy landowners spread out with the expansion of Roman territories. Expansion offered new lands to be cultivated and the wealthy landowners took up their opportunities.
because they blew up every roman and stole all there money
The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.The Roman assemblies were made up of citizens and determined by their tribe and/or their wealth.
A heterogeneous society is made up of different kinds of diverse people.