The painting you are referring to is not a painting the of the Borgia clan. It is titled "Cardinal Bandinello Sauli, His Secretary, and Two Geographers" by Sebastiano del Piombo in 1516.
Clues that it is a minor hoax are easy to spot if you know where to look. The figure alleged to be Machiavelli looks nothing like other portraits painted during his association with these men. Furthermore, Machiavelli was only a second chancellor of common birth assign to the vatican as an ambassador. Yet he is granted more focus than Cesare, who was a duke.
Although "Pedro" is holding his gloves as a mark of distinction and "Niccolo" has his hand on a book, to denote great knowledge. "Cesare" is not even wearing his official ceremonial beret, as seen in his more famous portraits.
On top of that, the relationship of these men at that time was friendly but tense. I could understand someone snapping a group photo of these men working together. But having them sit together for hours on end for a portrait? No way.
and who would pay for it, other than Cesare, and if he commisioned a group portrait of his coworkers, then why would he be barely in frame in the background?
There are in fact two paintings of the same subject: or an origina and a copy
one , attributed to Sebasiano del Piombo is at the National Gallery of Washington, and is labelled as Cardinal Bandinello Sauli (The handbell reports the letters B DE SAULIS CAR.
The other one is in Collezione Albani in Rome (Italy) Hosted in Villa Albani-Torlonia. The painting is attributed to a "master of '500'' and the cardinal is referred as Pedro loys (Luis) Borgia: the handbell reports ADR RAON .
The painting "Cardinal Luis Pedro Borgia with Cesare Borgia, Niccolò Machiavelli, and Don Michelotto" was painted by Giorgio Vasari in the 16th century. It depicts the controversial figures of Cesare Borgia, Niccolò Machiavelli, Don Michelotto, and Cardinal Luis Pedro Borgia in a historical context.
The most well-known portrait of Machiavelli was painted by Santi di Tito.
The worth of a portrait of anyone, let alone a Cardinal, depends on many things. First, which Cardinal? Second, who painted it? Third, who commissioned it originally? Fourth, is it an official portrait, or something more casual?
An inventory of 1492 records this painting hanging in the scrittoio of Lorenzo il Magnifico. It was painted for Cardinal Albergati, who is identifed in the inscription on the letter on the table.
carefully painted, quickly painted, slowly painted.
carefully painted, quickly painted, slowly painted.
It was painted in 1907 and he painted it for mother's day
When the painter painted his mother he painted her in the living- room
Painted bunting? Passerina ciris Painted stork? Mycteria leucodephala Painted quail? Coturnix chinensis Painted sandgrouse? Pterocles indicus Painted snipe? Rostratula beghalenisis and others
It was painted in 1904
Angus mazwell painted the abomination next door to were the mona Lisa was painted, they were both painted at the same time.
I think it was painted in 1893. Edvard Munch painted it.
It was painted in 1937.