Want this question answered?
He was not replaced. Lincoln as Commander in Chief and his "war board" acted as the military's Supreme Command.That is wrongeHe did get replaced by PopeCorrect - He was replaced by Pope, who was not the first choice but the only available choice. Lincoln and his war cabinet retained control over the plans of Pope for a brief time since they were nervous about the general failure of any general they had available to prosecute the war effectively. They finally gave in to bringing McClellan back after Pope proved worse than useless at 2d Manassas. Pope was sent to Minnesota to fight the Souix.
ANSWER Joseph Johnston was replaced two time. The first one was after he was injured during the Peninsular Campaign and replaced byt Robert E. Lee. The second one was during the Atlanta Campaign, when he was replaced by John Bell Hood.
his offensive was to slow moving that lee and Jackson had time to concentrate their forces
George McClellan
It was the first battle of the Civil War, the first time shots were fired
Lincoln fired several generals. He fired McClellan twice.
George McClellan, he was later fired for slow reaction time, hired back by Lincoln, then fired again for not doing anything when he had a chance to crush the Confederacy. And after he was fired I believe it was George Meade.
Second Time Around - 2004 I You're Fired 1-12 was released on: USA: 10 January 2005
President Lincoln appointed Major General George B. McClellan to general in chief on November 1, 1861. He replaced the retiring General in Chief Winfield Scott. Lincoln relieved McClellan of his title on March 11, 1862. McClellan was not in Washington DC at this time. He was in the process of organizing the Peninsula campaign. It is written that Lincoln did not believe that McClellan could hold his position as general in chief and conduct the Peninsula campaign at the same time.
After Antietam (Sept 17, 1862) when McClellan once again believed he needed time for his troops to rest. President Lincoln replaced him (on Nov 7) with General Ambrose Burnside. That was the end of McClellan's service as a Union military leader. As an aside, General Burnside felt uncomfortable replacing George B. McClellan. He had been loyal to him, also, he was not sure the command of the Army of the Potomac would be a fit for his abilities.
There has been a false start.
Depends if it is the first or second time, they come back if it is their third suspension they are fired.
He was not replaced. Lincoln as Commander in Chief and his "war board" acted as the military's Supreme Command.That is wrongeHe did get replaced by PopeCorrect - He was replaced by Pope, who was not the first choice but the only available choice. Lincoln and his war cabinet retained control over the plans of Pope for a brief time since they were nervous about the general failure of any general they had available to prosecute the war effectively. They finally gave in to bringing McClellan back after Pope proved worse than useless at 2d Manassas. Pope was sent to Minnesota to fight the Souix.
No, you should have one replaced at a time, and do the second only after the first heals.
You can get fired for any kind of theft.
Halleck himself was never in a position to attack Lee. When he was appointed General-in-Chief in July 1862, he summoned McClellan back to Washington and ordered him to attack Lee in the Shenandoah. Lee defeated part of the Union army before McClellan was able to reach the spot. Next came the unexpected Union win at Antietam, but Halleck and the whole of Lincoln's cabinet criticised McClellan for failing to pursue and destroy Lee's army, and McClellan was replaced. Halleck then supervised the two further failed attacks on Lee (Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville), and the successful one at Gettysburg. The next campaign involving Lee was not till May 1864, by which time Halleck had been replaced.
It seems that Union General George B. McClellan learned that Confederate General Joseph Johnston was wounded at Fair Oaks and Jefferson Davis replaced him with Robert E. Lee. In McClellan's writings about the war he indicated that General Lee would not be a problem. He believed Lee was timid and lacked experience. This idea may have been the result of the time that McClellan's forces pushed Confederates out of western Virginia early in the war. At the time Lee was in charge of Rebels seeking to retain western Virginia but failed. There is no doubt that McClellan knew of Lee before the war.Lee of course had a stellar career before the war and was once the superintendent of West Point. Nevertheless, in June of 1862, McClellan did not fear Lee as Johnston's replacement.