answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Constitution

Incorrect answer. The correct answer is the Supreme Court in 1895 - Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432 (1895),

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Johnny Cochran Johnny Cochran

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Who said a man is innocent until proven guilty?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What happens when a defendant dies before his appeal goes through. Is the case closed and the he remains innocent until proven guilty?

Generally, if the defendant was originally proven guilty, and as said he dies before his appeal goes thru, the original verdict of "GUILTY" will be upheld. However, this may depend of certain state statutues.


Use the word suspicion in a sentence?

Suspicion amounted as the man exited the store. Suspicion is nothing he said, innocent until proven guilty! The suspicion grew to a new height when a man in a black suit ran away.


What will happen if the jury members can't decide a case?

hi there? why are people said to be innocent until proven quilty?


Is innocent a noun or an adjective?

Innocent is an adjective; innocence is the noun. "I am innocent!" he cried. The judge said 'your innocence will be proven in court.'


What did you have to do in the trial of combat?

if two people were said guilty they would fight. the winner was innocent because get kept them safe.


Which state is the only state with laws that are based on the Napoleonic code?

"Honor" it, or use it? No jurisdiction in this country utilizes the Napoleanic Code, which basically follows the principle that the defendant must prove themselves innocent, instead of our system of justice which holds that the defendant is innocent UNTIL proven guilty. That being said - our government honors the court findings of the French system of justice as legal and valid.


What were the consequences for citizens who didn't pay tax in Ancient Rome?

As you may know already, Ancient Rome had a strict code of laws. Even in the small act of tax fraud. First, the criminal would be convicted of the crime and be sent for judgement in front of the Roman Council Men. In Rome you were innocent until proven guilty, but if you were found guilty you would have your fingers chopped off from the knuckles. This was the consequence because the Rulers said quote," A man who cheats the government of money shall cheat himself of his cheating hands."


What was the result of the witchcraft trails in Salem?

Nineteen people were executed. The hundred and a half that remained in jail until they were pardoned had to sue to regain confiscated property. Puritanism lost some of its hold on Massachusetts because of the hangings of innocent people that Puritan religion said were guilty.


Only condition specified by the constitution concerning the nature of state governments?

That the state can only put someone in prison if they did a crime but it has to be proven before they are said that they are guilty.


Did obama say bin laden is innocent until proven guilty?

No, he never said that. He did say that if Osama Bin Laden were captured alive, he would receive a fair trial. But he mostly said that he was committed to finding Osama Bin Laden, and as Commander in Chief, if his military located Bin Laden, he would give the order to capture or kill him.


Why are fireworks forbidden is Islam?

Who said it was forbidden in Islam? Everything in Islam is permissible until proven impermissible.


How would our legal system be different if an accused person had to prove his or her innocence instead of the government having to prove the person's guilt?

If an accused person had to prove their innocence, it would reverse the burden of proof, which is currently on the prosecution. This would likely lead to an increase in wrongful convictions, as it can be challenging for individuals to prove a negative (their innocence). It would also undermine the presumption of innocence, a fundamental principle in our legal system.