no it is not
divided between national govt and lower levels of govt.
The Founding Fathers wanted to guard against tyranny, so the government was divided into the branches. It was believed that each branch would "check" the other branches so that no one branch became too powerful.
where the powers of government are divided and the concentration of power are in the hands of center government
I think is federalism
When Abraham Lincoln said that a house divided against itself could not stand, he was referring to the issue of slavery. He did not believe the US government could endure operating with one half allowing slavery and the other not.
it divided the powers into three branchesIt divided the federal government into three branches.
it divided the powers into three branchesIt divided the federal government into three branches.
it divided the powers into three branchesIt divided the federal government into three branches.
it divided the powers into three branchesIt divided the federal government into three branches.
it divided the powers into three branchesIt divided the federal government into three branches.
it divided the powers into three branchesIt divided the federal government into three branches.
It divided the federal government into the three branches
Divided government is when one party controls the White House and another party controls one or both chambers of Congress. Pundits believe divided government to be an undesirable result of separation of powers and warn that it results in serious political gridlock.
No."A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved; I do not expect the house to fall; but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction, or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the states, old as well as new, North as well as South." ~ Abraham Lincoln
No. That is just a rather lame multiple-choice distractor. On June 16, 1858, when Lincoln was seeking the Republican nomination for US Senator from Illinois, he gave a speech since referred to as the "House Divided" speech. In part, he said A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently, half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved - I do not expect the house to fall - but I do expect it will cease to be divided. Lincoln's statement alluded to the battle over slavery, which was then legal throughout the South (as far north as Maryland and Delaware).
"A house divided against itself cannot stand." I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved -- I do not expect the house to fall -- but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinction; or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the States, old as well as new, North as well as South.What Lincoln means is that slavery will inevitablybe abolishedspread through out the entire United StatesThe source of the quote is the Bible, in Mark 3:25, which says, "And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand."The quote occurs in Lincoln's "House Divided" speech during the Lincoln Douglas debates.