0
Who says I am Thane of Cawdor If good why do you yield to that suggestion?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Macbeth.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
This line is spoken by Macbeth in William Shakespeare's play "Macbeth." Macbeth questions why he is being called the Thane of Cawdor if the current Thane is still alive. This moment in the play foreshadows Macbeth's own rise to power and his eventual downfall.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What suggestion would you suggest for a farmers to have a good yield?
What suggestion would you suggest for a farmers to have a good yield?
Good sir why do you start and seem to fear things that do sound so fair?
Macbeth- Act 1, Scene 3- Banquo says this to Macbeth because the witches just told MAcbeth he is the Thane of Cawdor and the Thane of Cawdor is still alive.
What does macduff vow to do to Macbeth and why?
After learning that he killed Macdonwald, the Thane of Cawdor (the traitor of Scotland), Duncan makes Macbeth the new Thane of Cawdor. He makes Macbeth the Thane because of his valiance in battle. After all, when a battle is done now-a days, awards and battle decorations are handed out, and the guys who were the bravest, most valiant soldiers are given awards like the Medal of Honor. Except that Macdonwald (whom Macbeth unseamed from the nave to the chaps) is a totally different person from "That most disloyal traitor, the Thane of Cawdor" (who was captured and later executed "Is execution done on Cawdor?"). In fact, they must have been involved in two totally seperate battles (as indeed they were historically) because Macbeth had no idea that the Thane of Cawdor was a traitor or had been condemned when the witches predict that he will be Cawdor or when Ross announces that he has been given the title. He could not have been involved in that battle. Macbeth was given the title of Thane of Cawdor for his valour in battle all right, but not because he had personally defeated the previous Thane. Macbeth never fought the previous Thane.
Who said 'The Thane of Cawdor lives Why do you dress me In borrowed robes'?
In Act 1 Scene 2, the noblemen Angus and Ross met up with friends and fellow Generals Macbeth [c. 1014-August 15, 1057] and Banquo. In the course of the conversation, Ross said that he was the bearer of good news from King Duncan I [d. August 14, 1040]. The King had given the title and possessions of the Thane of Cawdor to Macbeth. Macbeth didn't know that Cawdor had confessed to betraying his sovereign and asked to be punished. Cawdor held a powerful title and profitable properties. The disposition of Cawdor's earthly titles and possessions was the King's decision to make. Perhaps the King wasn't known for sharing outside of his immediate family. After all, his reward to Banquo for saving crown and county was just a 'thank you'. At any rate, the whole situation was unbelievable to Macbeth even though the witches previously had hailed him as Thane of Cawdor and King of Scotland. First and foremost, he didn't know of Cawdor's execution. And so, in Lines 108-109, Macbeth asked Angus and Ross, 'The Thane of Cawdor lives./Why do you dress me/In borrowed robes'?
Why does duncan choose to give the thane of cawdor to Macbeth?
Duncan gives the title of Thane of Cawdor to Macbeth as a reward for his bravery and loyalty in battle. Macbeth proved himself by defeating the traitorous Thane of Cawdor and securing victory for Duncan's forces. This gesture also reflects Duncan's trust in Macbeth and his desire to honor those who serve him faithfully.
What does ross tell the king about the thane of cawdor?
Ross tells the king that the thane of Cawdor confessed his treasonous acts before being executed. Ross explains that the thane of Cawdor faced his fate with dignity and repentance for his betrayal. This revelation foreshadows Macbeth's own downfall due to his own ambitious and treacherous actions.
What does ross report about confrontation with the thane of cawdor?
Macbeth did not have a confrontation with the Thane of Cawdor. The general Ross is talking about in Act 1 Scene 2 is someone else. Ross says, "Norway himself, assisted by that most disloyal traitor, the Thane of Cawdor, began a dismal conflict, till that Bellona's bridegroom, lapp'd in proof, confronted him with self-comparisons, point against point rebellious, arm 'gainst arm, curbing his lavish spirit, and, to conclude, the victory fell on us." Macbeth is not mentioned. For good reason, because "Bellona's bridegroom" is someone else. We know that for a number of reasons. First, the battle described by the bloody sergeant took place at Forres. Macbeth defeated Macdonwald at this battle. The battle Ross is talking about took place at Fife, which is about 140 miles away by modern roads. Ross has come from the end of the battle at Fife as fast as he can to Forres to bring the news to the king. It is unthinkable that Macbeth could have made the same trip (which would take about 14 hours by horseback) and have arrived at the beginning of a battle in Forres many hours before Ross. Second, Macbeth does not know that Cawdor is a traitor until Ross tells him as much in Act 1 Scene 4. When the witches call him Thane of Cawdor, Macbeth says, "The Thane of Cawdor lives, a prosperous gentleman," and when Ross tells him he is the Thane of Cawdor, he says, "The Thane of Cawdor lives; why do you dress me in borrowed robes?" If Macbeth had captured Cawdor it would be ridiculous to describe him as a "prosperous gentleman" and not know why Cawdor is about to be stripped of his title. Third, not only does Macbeth's reaction show that he has no idea of Cawdor's treachery, but Ross's reaction to him shows that Ross knows that Macbeth knows nothing of Cawdor's treachery. When Macbeth says that Cawdor is still alive, Ross says, "Who was the thane lives yet, but under heavy judgement bears that life which he deserves to lose. Whether he was combined with those of Norway, or did line the rebel with hidden help and vantage, or that with both he labour'd in his country's wreck, I know not. But treasons capital, confess'd and proved, have overthrown him." Would Ross have made this explanation if Macbeth had confronted the Thane of Cawdor in any way at all? Of course not! It would be ridiculous. It would be like telling Elliot Ness the news that someone has captured Al Capone for doing something illegal. If Macbeth had defeated Cawdor, and Ross had reported the same to Duncan, Ross would not have to make any explanation at all to Macbeth. He would instead have been asking Macbeth for details of Cawdor's treachery. Finally, after the sergeant has told us all about what a great general Macbeth is, and how good at splitting people from the nave to the chaps, what would be the point of having another character say exactly the same thing about him? This would be to gild refined gold or to paint the lily. It would be superfluous. The mature Shakespeare does not write superfluous lines. Ross's report is included in the scene for quite another purpose than to heap further praise upon Macbeth (without ever naming him). Duncan must hear about Cawdor's treachery so that he can give the title to Macbeth. Ross's story of the defeat of the Norwegians at Fife, including the treachery of Cawdor, brings that news to Duncan. It is irrelevant who won the battle at Fife, so he is called "Bellona's bridegroom".
How do you know that king Duncan was not a good judge of character?
King Duncan's lack of discernment in character judgment is evident in his trust of Macbeth, who ultimately betrays and murders him. Duncan's failure to see the ambition and deceit within Macbeth's character highlights his naivety and lack of insight into the true nature of those around him.
How did Macbeth respond to Ross's news?
The news from Angus and Ross was received with distrust by Banquo and with disbelief by Macbeth [c. 1014-August 15, 1057]. In Act 1 Scene 3 of the Shakespearean play, the three witches greeted Macbeth as Thane of Glamis, which he already was; Thane of Cawdor, which he didn't know himself to be; and King of Scotland, which he knew that he wasn't. They then disappeared as quickly as they had appeared. Next, the noble Scotsmen Angus and Ross showed up with surprising news. They told Macbeth of his being granted the vacated earthly title and possessions of the Thane of Cawdor. Banquo essentially made the distrustful observation that the Devil wasn't in the truthtelling business. As he later explained, mortals needed to worry when supernaturals made their nefarious presence and actions known. In contrast, Macbeth was taken aback by the improbability of the situation. The last thing that he knew, Cawdor was alive. He additionally might have been disbelieving of the news that King Duncan I [d. August 14, 1040] would have given him such a powerful noble title and such a profitable possession. The King mightn't have been known to share. After all, he found a 'thank you' sufficient for Banquo's role in saving Scotland from invaders and traitors
How is suggetion spelled?
suggestion - Does anyone have a good suggestion as to what we can do today.
What qualities made Duncan a good king?
Duncan was not a particularly good king. He was particularly bad at spotting when someone was going to betray him: not only Macbeth but also the previous Thane of Cawdor fooled him completely. He also showed his lack of judgement in making his son Malcolm the heir to the throne when Malcolm was clearly unsuited for the job. Nepotism came out on top of merit there. Duncan was a virtuous man, perhaps, but not a good king.
What is a good sentence using the word yield?
Yield to stop sign.
