The judge.
The defendant gave the court an unintentional clue.
The judge
'Consecutive' sentences.
They are referred to a Mandatory Sentencing Laws. The state legislatures of various states have passed certain laws in which the law itself states what the exact penalty will be if the defendant is convicted. Judges have no sentencing discretion in these cases at all.
The state in which the alleged incident occurred.
Here are the conjugates of the verb acquit: The court will acquit the defendant. (future) The court acquits the defendant. (present) The court acquitted the defendant. (past) The court has acquitted the defendant. (past participle) We've put them in sentences for you to make it easier to see them in action. Notice how in the present tense we add the "s" to the verb.
legal requirement for acquiring admissible statements because all the states require that evidence provided by the defendant be voluntary obtained from such a defendant without violation of any rights of a defendant. The only difference which has been observed in all the states is that in California, admissibility of statement depends on the decision of the judges unlike in other states where admissibility of statements is based on the circumstances under which the statement was obtained and application of the law concerning obtaining of evidence from a defendant or a witness. From a personal perspective, the most interesting concept regarding admissibility of statements in these states is that the rights of the defendant are highly observed while obtaining any form of information from the defendant. His shows that, despite the defendant being the one who is usually accused for committing a certain offence, he or she does not cease to be a human being and should therefore be accorded all the rights that a human being is entitled to.
In most states, the judge can reject the plea agreement and the defendant has the right to withdraw his guilty plea. This does not necessarily force a trial because the prosecution and defense can at that point renegotiate the deal.
NO!
a plus
'Jarred always ate anchovies' is just a plain old ordinary declarative sentence. There's nothing special about declarative sentences. Most sentences are declarative sentences. A declarative sentence merely states a fact.
In most states, no. However, in some states they are allowed under certain circumstances. It's typically not within the trial judge's discretion when to and not to admit this evidence. Most states' appellate/supreme courts have set out rules in case law for when polygraph is admissible. For example, in several states, a polygraph is admissible in a criminal case when it is first introduced by the defendant, but the state may not be the first to introduce it. However, if the defendant introduces a polygraph test, the state may rebut that evidence with a conflicting exam.