Want this question answered?
Some achievements of the Qin dynasty were making canals and roads connected to one spot around the palace. This made travel easier for everyone, water or road, especially for the armies, as they could spread out more because of the 50 pace-wide roads. And they also standardized many things including measurements, axles, weight, written language, and money.
Emperor Shi Huang Di standardized the first money in the 2nd Century BCE. He also standardized the wheel axle width, weights and measures and connected the parts of the Wall to form the major parts of the Wall that is known today.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.
• He set up a bureaucracy in which workers are appointed and trained for their jobs. • He headed the bureaucracy and appointed three officials to hold the highest government and military positions. • He made all measurements and money the same across the empire. • He standardized the written characters so everyone could communicate. • He took land away from the nobles, enabling any man to own land. • He ordered the censorship of ideas and the burning of books that did not agree with him. • He built the Great Wall of China to keep the peasants in and enemy invaders out. :)
Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.Trading throughout the empire helped unify it because the merchants used the same money, (or could quickly exchange it), the same language, the same weights and measures and the same regulations of trade.
He was tired of people not accepting other money types.
He had everyone in the empire use the same money system of weights and measurements.
Some achievements of the Qin dynasty were making canals and roads connected to one spot around the palace. This made travel easier for everyone, water or road, especially for the armies, as they could spread out more because of the 50 pace-wide roads. And they also standardized many things including measurements, axles, weight, written language, and money.
because then your dad will come back with mik
Emperor Shi Huang Di standardized the first money in the 2nd Century BCE. He also standardized the wheel axle width, weights and measures and connected the parts of the Wall to form the major parts of the Wall that is known today.
Ancient Babylonians did not have money. Instead they used weights of things for commerce. Weights of barley were used, as were weights of silver. The weight they used was the shekel, and the first syllable of that word comes from an Akkadian term for barley. There is a link below to an article on money, which has a history section.
yes
I assume you mean 'How are measurements important in markets?'. Well, it all depends on the market but if you are selling commodities or produce you need to know the sizes or weights of the goods, and so does your customer. You also need to "measure" the money to ensure your business succeeds.
relative weights
relative weights.
Free weights cost less money. People have used free weights on a weight bench and have not used a spotter. The free weights have fallen on them and killed them. A universal machine is more expensive. You can not drop a universal machine on yourself.
No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.No, not in the least. In the Roman empire itself the money was standardized. When dealing with foreign currency, the Romans had bankers or money changers called "argtentari". These men were responsible for the exchange of coins among other things.