The South advocated Slavery and States Rights.
He insisted that his only goal was to save the union, not end slavery
The orth
Slaveowners, and those who were strong supporters of states' rights. While many white Southerners did not own slaves, those who did often owned dozens or hundreds of them. If slavery was ended then they wouldn't be able to profit as much for their land and become wealthier. Slavery was an essential part of the economy in the Southern United States. Some people supported the right to own slaves not because they owned slaves personally, but because they were strongly dedicated to states' rights. Because slavery was not mentioned during the writing of the Constitution, it was assumed that it could continue to exist, and could only be regulated by individual states. Those who argued for a federal ban of slavery were considered to be infringing on the rights of states to decide things or their citizens when the power was not explicitly given to the national government. Additionally, many people in the United States were not actively for or against slavery, but utterly neutral.
Some differences were that the South supported slavery and the North didn't, the South was based on agriculture and the North on industries (like factories), and the South wanted more states' rights while the North supported a federal government.
The issue was states rights versus federal rights. The surface issue was slavery.
Some states that supported slavery were Tennessee, North Carolina, and Delaware. Some of the states that opposed slavery were New york, Vermont, and Ohio.
Southerners typically supported slavery because the south's major crop was cotton which was difficult to pick so they get slaves to do it. Northerners opposed slavery mainly because they had no need for it because of the rocky soil.
the southern part of the us supported slavery and the north was against it. however some states in the south still supported it so the fact that it was in or near to the south, related to the fact that it supported slavery.
He insisted that his only goal was to save the union, not end slavery
John C. Calhoun
Who is Lucretia Mott?that is the answer
a rope
The Emancipation Proclamation changed the purpose of the Civil War from one of states' rights to that of slavery.
The orth
Daniel Webster
dang it
Officially for the States Right but actually for States Right and to protect their way of life, which included also the slavery.