There is a famous organization-Peta who fights for animals rights. Here is a link to their list of who tests and who doesn't test on animals: http://search.caringconsumer.com/search.aspx however i would not recommend browsing their site because they have many disturbing photos and videos of animal abuse. the link however has none of that just inly click on the list nothing else
Erasistratus and Aristotle were apparently the 1st to do animal testing back in the 2nd and 4th century BCE. The Greeks made reference to animal testing in their writings.
That depends on what the testing is. For most logical tests, yes.
which country does the most tests on animals
its testing no one likes tests but hey, you know that ANIMAL testing is wrong? so yes, i they should (unless they're blood tests)
No, it is not. Animal testing is when companies and factories perform tests on animals using their products to test the results. Animal dissection is like an autopsy. It is when they open up the animal to see what is inside.
Because animal tests are cruel and animals could die.
There are three main types of animal testing:1. Product testing animals are used to test the safety of products for consumption. Typically, these are linked to cosmetic testing, such as makeup and soap and stuff like that.2. Research tests are performed for advancements in medicine and science, such as experiments with new drugs.3. Education and training these tests range from a high school dissection of a frog to training medical students at Uni.
The only way that any animal testing is "good" is because if it is safe on the animal, then it is generally safe on the person. This makes products for people safe to use. You have to weigh this up with the need though. Is it always needed to torture hundreds of animals for your makeup? This is why some people choose only to support medical animal testing, or no animal testing at all.
Absolutely. Animal product testing is unnecessarily cruel and generally not required by law. In 2007 the U.S. National Academy of Sciences called for a shift away from animal toxicology tests towards other testing methods. Over 500 US companies now are "cruelty free" and have stopped or have never tested on animals.
None. "Animal testing" is done almost exclusively on very, very common animals, like rats.
Animals are used for pure research such as genetics, developmental biology, behavioral studies, as well as applied research such as biomedical research, xenotransplantation, drug testing and toxicology tests, including cosmetics testing.
What is wrong with animal testing? Is it better to see if things would kill humans by killing humans? Scientists will always prefer the most conclusive methods of experimentation, so when they can use simpler experiments than animal tests they do.
1) it is crulity to animals. 2)it is illegal to do it when they are alive. 3)it should be illegal for people to do tests on dead animals.