Nero.
Qin Shi Huangdi burned documents that indicated that he was not the first ruler of China.
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
Because Shi Huangdi burned books, forced nobles to move away, and forced commoners to work on government projects. Therefore, historians must have thought that Shi Huangdi wasn't a great and fair ruler for doing that. If I am wrong, sorry. That's the best I can do, hope I helped.
Cortez conquered the Aztecs in 1521. After landing in Mexico in 1519 he systematically besieged and destroyed the Aztec Empire and on August 13, 1521 he captured Cuauhtemoc, the ruler of Tenochtitlán.
she was the ruler of egypt.
That was Sennacherib.
the new king
Nero.He famously carried on with his jolly tune on the violin, even though a smoke detetor was going off: he fiddled while Rome burnt !
Ahuizotl was the first ruler, then Montezuma II, but he died in1520, and in 1521, the Atzec Empire was destroyed along with Tenochtitlan by the Spanish.
Nero
They were killed by Spanish people. The Inca ruler - Atahualpa was killed by Pizarro's Spanish army.
Qin Shi Huangdi burned documents that indicated that he was not the first ruler of China.
he WA a very very strict ruler and killed anyone who opposed him.!!.
Yes it can. It negates the effect of any EFFECT MONSTER that is destroyed by any fiend monsters.
Akbar is actually a Mughal Emperor who was The ruler in India during the early 1700s. Before Akbar's rule Mughal era was not well known. Akbar was very good with keeping perfect political relations. This ruler singlehandedly almost unfied India in all its multi-ethinicity. However he was still an invader from the west. Hence it is quite ambiguious where he lies on terms of being a good or bad ruler. But in comparison to his grandson aurangazeb who desecrated andd destroyed temples, Akbar was a very good ruler. So yea make your choice.
A WOOD RULER A STONE RULER A IRON RULER A DIAMOND RULER A EMERALD RULER
Sundiata led an attack against Sumanguru's capitol city of Sosso, in Mali, and destroyed it in a single morning. But, Sunni Ali became the ruler of Songhai in 1464 and a lot of the land he added to his kingdom had been part of the Mali Empire. Hope I helped. I just happen to be learning about this too.