Want this question answered?
They didn’t create a weak national government, but one with a balanced set of powers.
There was no executive under the Articles of Confederation because the Founding Fathers feared the return of tyranny. The Founding Fathers were very cautious not to create a new "king"- that was exactly why they had separated from England. so as a result, there was no executive to carry out the laws passed by Congress. This lack of a leader caused much confusion.
The main, or central, benefactor, or principle, of Jacksonian Democracy is majority rule.
It set up a weak democracy. Under the Articles of Confederation, the national government was weak and had little power. There was a legislature, but no executive or judicial branch.
it was very weak. no standing army no taxing by national government no single national currency no executive leadership
Weak
City Council
They didn’t create a weak national government, but one with a balanced set of powers.
They didn’t create a weak national government, but one with a balanced set of powers.
There was no executive under the Articles of Confederation because the Founding Fathers feared the return of tyranny. The Founding Fathers were very cautious not to create a new "king"- that was exactly why they had separated from England. so as a result, there was no executive to carry out the laws passed by Congress. This lack of a leader caused much confusion.
The main, or central, benefactor, or principle, of Jacksonian Democracy is majority rule.
Some crafted a weak executive.
in the strong-mayor system the mayor has strong executive power, and the weak-mayor system the mayors authority is limited
Weak mayor-council government
in the strong-mayor system the mayor has strong executive power, and the weak-mayor system the mayors authority is limited
👍🏾
in the strong-mayor system the mayor has strong executive power, and the weak-mayor system the mayors authority is limited