European rulers between 800 and 1500 turned to knights to fight their battles for them. Modern armies emerged after 1500.
Lords = masters, rulers, aristocrats, peerage, knights, leaders, monarchs, potentates, princes, sovereigns, or superiors.
Uhm.... You don't? It's Zelda. (Ya know, Like knights and dragons and evil rulers and stuff) It's not Star Wars. So... You don't get one.
Sounds like a title to a thesis, but after reading their history I would say more blood thirsty fools than autocratic oafs. A (#2): The Teutonic Knights were like all other rulers of the time. The vast majority of medieval European rulers were autocratic. As for them being blood thirsty, once again they compare evenly with secular leaders of the time. So, simply put, they were just another medieval organization ruling a kingdom.
The rulers of the European feudal system included monarchs, who held the highest authority over the land, and were often supported by powerful nobles or lords. These lords managed large estates and granted portions of their land to vassals or knights in exchange for military service and loyalty. Below the knights were the serfs and peasants, who worked the land but had limited rights and lived under the obligations of the feudal hierarchy. This system created a structured society based on land ownership and reciprocal duties among different classes.
Arthur knights
James E. Hewitt has written: 'The Apostle Peter, Henry Vaughan, and \\' -- subject(s): Adaptations, Arthurian romances, History and criticism, Kings and rulers in literature, Knights and knighthood in literature
the knights of the round table
You need to get the Black Knights because they are the strongest knights.
in a dictatorship rulers
The knights of Columbus are catholic. The knights of Columbus are catholic.
Cindy Mediavilla has written: 'Arthurian fiction' -- subject(s): Bibliography, Arthurian romances, Knights and knighthood in literature, Adaptations, Britons in literature, English fiction, Kings and rulers in literature, American fiction