Ignorance...
A "loser's attitude" or a "lack of confidence"; both of which were attributed to not winning the Vietnam War.
Nothing could have caused the us to win this insane war.
An all volunteer US Armed Forces as a result of draft resistance and protest.
No, the US was committed to not losing, which was entirely different then winning. It was never an attempt at winning a war, just deny the North a victory and prop up the South.
The North Vietnamese got to do more communism.
The north drove their tanks into the south's capital, winning the war.
The outcomes were NOT the same: 1. Communists were stopped at the 38th parallel in the Korean War. 2. Communists conquered South Vietnam (winning the war) in April 1975.
They thought it sucked that all the students were protesting against the war because they had no idea what war is like. But they thought also war sucks - they nonethless were committed to winning.
Their famous T54 tank crashing thru the enemies palace gates that day; winning the war.
batman
By 1967, the U.S. was not winning the Vietnam War despite significant military involvement and resources. The Tet Offensive in early 1968, which occurred shortly after 1967, marked a turning point, revealing the strength and resolve of the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese forces. Public support for the war began to wane in the U.S. as media coverage highlighted the harsh realities of the conflict, leading to increasing anti-war sentiment. Overall, 1967 was a year of growing challenges for U.S. forces in Vietnam.