are you asking me to do your homework for you? Stop being lazy and look in your textbook or on TCI!
are you asking me to do your homework for you? Stop being lazy and look in your textbook or on TCI!
Atahualpa, because it had more experience in the army and tricks also the other curacas trust more atahualpa than huascar
Curacas were indigenous leaders appointed by the Inca Empire to govern local communities. They served as liaisons between the Inca rulers and the people in their region, helping to enforce laws, collect taxes, and administer justice. Their role was important in maintaining control over the empire's vast territories.
In the inca soity everyone served the king and they thought that he was the sun of the sun god so few opposed him and that ment we the lesser nobles or curacas told you that the king wanted you to work you worked.and there loyalty to the king was strong.
it was pretty basic but this system allowed the Inca empire to work like clock work it was perfect as long as every on did there job's .at the top was the Sapa Inca then his relatives then the curacas or the lesser nobles then the local village headmen and finally the ordinary people.
it was pretty basic but this system allowed the Inca empire to work like clock work it was perfect as long as every on did there job's .at the top was the Sapa Inca then his relatives then the curacas or the lesser nobles then the local village headmen and finally the ordinary people.
The Inca were able to control their empire through subordination and cooperation. They divided and conquered the people living there and then would move them, after conquering, to another place. This was a great form of control when the conquered people didn't have the "home terf" advantage. Each area of land had a local ruler or, curacas, and were allowed to maintain their positions and were given privileges in return for their loyalty to the Inca. Their series of roads and, tambos- or inns- allowed rapid communication and troop movement, thus allowing the Inca empire to be constantly united.
It is unclear from the archaeological record to what extent they had classes. Some locations appear to have been dominated by a religious caste or class. there were clearly leaders and there were different trades. To what extent this was like a class system with movement between them forbidden by custom, is unknown. They are no signs of hereditary rulers with much more wealth or different living quarters than others. The exception to this is the idea that the Chaco are might have been largely a supported religious caste. The examples of the modern and historic Pueblo people who are their descendants show not much in the way of social class. Society and power tends to be divided into clans and religious kiva societies. Certainly there is no evidence like the highly stratified societies in the Pacific Northwest with commoners, nobles, and slavery and elaborate displays of wealth.