Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona comprised four consolidated cases that were argued at the same time. Gary K. Nelson represented the state of Arizona; John J. Flynn represented the petitioner, Miranda.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
John J. Flynn, founding partner of Flynn, Kimerer, Thinnes & Derrick* argued for Ernesto Miranda before the US Supreme Court in 1966
*Flynn, Kimerer, Thinnes & Derrick is now Kimerer & Derrick, P.C., described as one of the preeminent criminal law firms in the Southwestern US.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Miranda v. Arizona comprised four consolidated cases that were argued at the same time. Gary K. Nelson represented the state of Arizona; John J. Flynn represented the petitioner, Miranda.
List of Advocates:
Miranda v. Arizona, No. 759
Miranda: John J. Flynn
Arizona: Gary K. Nelson
California v. Stewart, No. 584
California: Gordon Ringer
Stewart: William A. Norris
Vignera v. New York, No. 760
Vignera: Victor M. Earle, III
New York: William I. Siegel
Westover v. United States, No. 761
Westover: F. Conger Fawcett
United States: Thurgood Marshall (Solicitor General)
Amici Curiae
Telford Taylor (for State of New York)
Duane R. Nedrud (National District Attorneys Association, urging affirmance in Miranda and Vignera, and reversal in California)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Miranda v. Arizona
5-4 miranda wins
Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
No.
1966
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff; the state of Arizona was the defendant. In a court case, the plaintiff/petitioner's name is always listed first, and the defendant/respondent's name is listed last.
(1966) *Rights of the Accused
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona