Want this question answered?
In the spoils system, also known as the patronage system, elected officials give government jobs to their supporters, friends, and relatives, regardless of how qualified they are for the job. In the merit system, government employees are hired or promoted based on their ability to perform a job, regardless of their political connections.
Pennsylvania's state government contains many well-qualified individuals. Its government holds approximately twenty of the state's finest politicians.
Religious Freedom. Government jobs go to the most qualified which prevents nepotism. Eliminated many injustices.
Australia (AUS) -- qualified June 6th Japan (JPN) -- qualified June 6th Korea DPR (PRK) -- qualified June 17th Korea Republic (KOR) -- qualified June 6th Denmark (DEN) -- qualified October 10th England (ENG) -- qualified September 9th France (FRA) -- qualified November18th Germany (GER) -- qualified October 10th Greece (GRE) -- qualified November18th Italy (ITA) -- qualified October 10th Netherlands (NED) -- qualified June 6th Portugal (POR) -- qualified November18th Serbia (SRB) -- qualified October 10th Slovakia (SVK) -- qualified October 14th Slovenia (SVN) -- qualified November18th Spain (ESP) -- qualified September 9th Switzerland (SUI) -- qualified October 14th Honduras (HON) -- qualified October 14th Mexico (MEX) -- qualified October 10th USA (USA) -- qualified October 10th Algeria (ALG) -- qualified November18th Cameroon (CMR) -- qualified November14th Côte d'Ivoire (CIV) -- qualified October 10th Ghana (GHA) -- qualified September 6th Nigeria (NGA) -- qualified November14th South Africa (RSA) -- did not need to qualify as hosts (May 15th 2004) New Zealand (NZL) -- qualified November 14th Argentina (ARG) -- qualified October 14th Brazil (BRA) -- qualified September 5th Chile (CHI) -- qualified October 10th Paraguay (PAR) -- qualified September 9th Uruguay (URU) -- qualified November18th
They qualified automatically as hosts.
The philosophy of qualified individualism is choosing the best qualified candidate for employment, admission, or other privilege after ruling out certain categories such as race, gender, age, etc. The opposite would be unqualified individualism in which the best candidate is chosen regardless of the above categories.
Is it always better to hire a more qualified and productive worker than a less qualified and productive one regardless of cost. True or false? Explain
petition
Jackson.
That man was a good candidate for the job because he was well qualified.
In the spoils system, also known as the patronage system, elected officials give government jobs to their supporters, friends, and relatives, regardless of how qualified they are for the job. In the merit system, government employees are hired or promoted based on their ability to perform a job, regardless of their political connections.
She's not. I'm from MN.
Patronage, the giving of government jobs to people who had helped a candidate get elected, was a problem because the employees given these jobs were many times not qualified for the political position. They many times used their new position for personal gain.
Because he is the best qualified candidate for the position.
I would hope so and I believe many would vote for the most qualified candidate, despite their religious preference. Sadly, however, there will always be people who would vote for someone less-qualified because of a person's religion.
party officials decide if a candidate is qualified and of good character.
party officials decide if a candidate is qualified and of good character.