The United States won, as Fred Korematsu was not granted his appeal and was sent to an internment camp, and none of the Japanese-American's cases were looked into. This fool has no idea what he is talking about... he was not even close to knowing what really happened with Fred Korematsu. Korematsu won this as some would say "battle" against the United States. Fred Korematsu did not have to go to the internment camp.
No the government did in a 6-3 decision
The US won
John Ross
Thurgood Marshall was lead counsel for the NAACP-sponsored case Brown v. Board of Education, (1954), and its follow-up case Brown v. Board of Education II, (1955). He argued 32 civil rights cases before the US Supreme Court, and won 29 of them. In 1967, President Lyndon Johnson appointed Marshall to the US Supreme Court, making him the first African-American justice in the Court's history.
This Supreme Court case (268 U.S. 510(1925), was named for Walter Pierce, governor of Oregon and a group of nuns who ran a private school. The case challenged a 1922 Oregon law that required most students not home schooled to attend public schools from age 8 to 16 or until graduating from 8th grade. The sisters won their case in Oregon district court; the supreme court case was due to appeal by the state of Oregon. The decision lead to the beginning of broadening of protection of rights under the 14th amendment. The sisters argued that the law caused enrollment in their school to decline violating contracts they had made to provide education.
She was the first African-American woman to win a court case against a white man
chapman won the supreme court case
The US won
If you're talking about the Supreme Court case, then Illinois "won" in the sense that it got to use the evidence.
roy wilkins
roy wilkins
The Supreme Court reversed the decision in favour of Milkovich.
John Ross
Segregated schools are unconstitutional A+
Thorgood Marshal. He was the lawyer in the 1950's for the Brown case. His argument that " separate but equal " was not equally won the case.
No one--the case was never heard. The case was dismissed by the Federal Circuit Court. It was re-filed in state court, where it was dismissed on the same grounds (sovereign immunity). The dismissal was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
If you appeal the case to the Supreme Court, you lost in a lower court.Answer:That depends on whether you're the party appealing the decision (the Appellee or Petitioner) or the opposing party (the Appellant or Respondent). If you're petitioning the Court for a writ of certiorari, you're asking the court to review the case because you lost.If someone else is petitioning a case in which you were the opposing party, it means you won and your opponent is contesting the verdict.Every case has a winner and a loser. You didn't specify which side you were on, hypothetically.
I guess that would depend on what supreme court you are talking about - i.e., in what country.