graphics artists.. the color reproduction is better on a crt then on most low grade lcds... and they are cheaper then the expensive lcds
wow the first decent question today.. congrats, everyone else in an idiot
They are Monitors for faster speed and better graphics
CRT monitors are generally only still useful in harsh environments where an LCD monitor would not last, such as due to vibration, heat, or dust / debris.
crt monitor situation used
At this point, I would say that a CRT had no advantages over a LCD monitor. The LCD is probably cheaper, it takes up less space, is easier on the eyes, and provides better revolutions.
CRT monitors use a beam of electrons to form the picture - LCD's use microscopic pixels. CRT's need large amounts of electricity to form the picture - LCD's work with low voltages.
CRT: Use more power, lower resolution LCD flat screen: price
CRT stands for Cathode Ray Monitor. These monitors have a glass screen.
flat-panel
No, unless you are still using a CRT monitor.
It is cheaper than a LCD monitor.
The monitor was a 12" CRT.
If your question is "does the use of a 17" CRT effect the power consumption of a dual core processor", the answer is no. The total power consumption of your system can depend on the monitor you use but, the power consumption of the processor is fixed by design not the monitor used.
It's a CRT which stands for Cathode Ray tube.