The newer Abrams would win. It has advanced armor design and a 120-mm gun. The German Tiger had the beginnings of slopped armor but only had an 88-mm gun.
Also the Abrams new optic sight allows for thermal and infra-red imaging to see in the dark and through the smoke.
You're not comparing apples to apples. You're comparing technology that is almost 70 years old to tech that is state of the art. Who would win in a tug of war? An original model T Ford or a new F-550 diesel? See my point? By the way....the gun on the abrams, its German made.
If you ever get a chance to go to Aberdeen they have a King tiger there and an Abrams on display. Its mind boggling how FREAKN BIG the King Tiger compared to the Abrams. It would be scarey to have that sucker rolling at you, 70 yrs old or not.
Tiger. Its the same word in German
There were several famous German Tanks. One of them was the Panzer, another was the Tiger tank, and lastly, the modern-day German tank is the Leopard II.
The same word. The tiger = der Tiger.
Tiger (tee-ger) its the same
das Tiger-Auto
t1:german tiger 1 t2:german tiger 2 t1:armor 69 t2:armor 89 t1:speed 14 mph t2:speed 20 mph t1:gun is 98% great t2:gun is 99% good so german tiger 2 is better
Tiger. Its the same word but pronounced Teeger.
yes
Tiger, wach auf. (Tiger is pronounced tea-ger)
Mk. VI, Panzer 6, tiger royal, King tiger.
No
According to Wikipedia (and other sources), the range of the German Tiger 1 tank was a maximum of 190km.