Who would win in a fight Jason Bourne or Aaron Cross?

Answer 1

James Bond, who is a weapons expert, would have a considerable advantage over Jason Bourne, who specializes in hand-to-hand combat. Bourne could fend off quite a few, but would eventually be overwhelmed, Bond may be able to use weaponry to hold them off indefinitely.

P.S. I'm not biased, I like Bourne a lot more then Bond.

I don't know, though. Part of Bourne's training would have to involve heavy weapons use. And, he killed the Professor (a sniper, by the way) with a double-barrel shotgun, so that counts for something. Overall, I think Bourne's battlefield improvisation would probably give him a fighting chance.

Oh, and if it was hand to hand... no contest.

ANSWER:

While Bourne is expert in hant to hand combat and weapon use, and could potencially beat James Bond, he could do nothing to stop thousands of Zombies. After Bourne took out Bond, whatever weapon he used(couldn't use nuke, he'd probably die from explosion or radiation), he couldn't stop them. If he used an rpg, he would take out maybe like 50, but the nhe would be overwhelmed when reloading, same with shotgun. NO pistols, he would take out a bunch true, but that wouldn't stop thousands. Zombies would win, hands down.

Answer 2

Bruce Lee. The all time greatest martial artist.

----

Jason Bourne is a fictional character. Bruce Lee was a real person. In reality, Bruce Lee would likely win.

However, hypothetically within the Bourne universe, Bourne has memory and reflex enhancements and may in theory have all of Bruce Lee's and other peoples training, which would mean within Bournes universe, he would probably win. It would all depend on how the writers decided to create the storyline for such a match up. The issue is irrelevant however since Bourne is not real, the decision would be entirely up to the writers.

Answer 3

Jason Bourne would win, because he has more experience and training, and has already done what Aaron Cross is just now doing.

Answer 4

Jason