in my opinion genghis khan would have won in that battle because he had a sharper brain. genghis khan also had a tall height of six feet. attila the hun was also good soldier. attila had conquered rome with a very intelligent brain. genghis khan was stronger and he would have kept at least 100 soldiers for himself. attila would have also kept for his self guard. both of them would have continued fighting for years but genghis khan would win being more intelligent and strong warrior
i think genghis khan would win. alexander was good at sword fighting but genghis khan was stronger than alexander. genghis khan was also very tall and experienced.
Towns would surrender to him without a fight
well a ninja would win because they are better trained and they knew martial arts and they also have superior weaponry. ****** In a fight between Genghis Khan and Ninja, Khan would win. Arrows from the recurve bow were deadly at 300 yards. Armor could not protect against them.
If there were no Genghis Khan, the Eurasian continent would not have been unified and knowledge would not have been shared between the East and the West. Then Renaissance, Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution would not have taken place and there would be no modernity and globalisation today.
This fight would never happen, no matter how you look at it.
Attila the Hun was known as the Scourge of God by the Romans and this term was adopted by many historians. If you want to know why, just research Attila the Hun, he was known to have massacred many and played a significant role in the collapse of the Roman Empire.
"My sister."
The Eastern Emperor of the Byzantine empire allegedly paid Attila the Hun a fee so the empire would not be attacked.
An AT-AT would definitely win.
carcharodontosaurus would win
Stuff