In some cases children are given higher priority over adults when waiting for organs. There are many reasons for this: one of the main ones is that a child's health tends to be far less stable than an adult's, even when they are both dying from the same stage of the same disease - children can deteriorate very quickly, and are not always able to articulate how exactly they feel ill, which can slow down the process of diagnoses. These situations are complex and very risky to the child involved.
Secondly, being very ill in childhood will impact a lot subsequently throughout their life - generally these children will have reduced rates of growth and development compared to healthy children, and these children do not always catch up after they have been transplanted. In that respect, it is worthwhile attempting to minimise the impact of being ill on their growth and development. (Adults do not have this problem. )
These are two pretty compelling medical reasons why children should be first, however there are also ethical reasons, such as whether it would be right to put the health of an adult (who's had a much longer lifespan) ahead of the health of a child (who has not had the privilege of a long life).
YES ~ And she decided to go the route of a bone marrow transplant. I love this because it really brings home the need for people to sign up on the marrow transplant lists.
Numbered lists are generally used when something has to be done in a certain sequence. By using numbers a person knows what should be done first, second, and so on.
If you can not continue paying on a new car, the first thing you should do is read the loan agreement. It probably lists the steps you should take. You are not the first person ever to have this problem.
There are many lists that show how development should be. One of the best books on this is "What to Expect in the First Year."
It is not usually argued that they should not have the oppertunity to have a transplant, but some believe that they should have to cover the costs themselves. Critria in place on transplant waiting lists already covers "who" should get the transplant when an organ becomes available. The criteria is updated regularly and is perfectly fair - therefore it is not right to 'ban' someone from having a transplant before they are one the waiting list if they have a reasonable expectation of getting better. For example, alcoholic's awaiting liver transplants have to meet exta criteria before being considered fit enough to put on the waiting list. This extra criteria is designed to ensure that they are likely to take care of the transplanted organ. e.g they are required to prove they have been alcohol-free for six months before being considered. However it is completely unfair to 'ban' them altogether.
Information like this would be considered private.
To browse consumer email lists you would need to buy such lists first as there are many companies who legally or illegaly compile such lists to sell them.
about 3,000 transplants are performed each year
what is the first choce on the list menue
The National Academy of Sciences has done limited research on this. In 2005, they published a Dietary Reference Intake book and it lists kilocalories required for children, but only for a specific height and weight. They plan on doing more research.
No, numbered lists within a sentence do not need to be capitalized. Each item in the list should start with a lowercase letter, unless it is a proper noun or the first word of a complete sentence.
It's true