0
Why Historians are concerned with accuracy of their writings and readings but are also aware of?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
inability of authors to know every angle of every story.
Diallo Mohamed B
Historians are concerned with accuracy to ensure that the information they provide is reliable and can be trusted by others. They are also aware of the limitations of historical sources, such as bias or incomplete information, and strive to critically evaluate and interpret these sources to present a well-rounded and nuanced understanding of the past.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why do archaeologist and historians try to find artifacts and writings from ancient civilizations?
answer Answer this question…
Why do archaeologists and historians try to find artifacts and writings from ancient civilizations?
Archaeologists study written sources to study human life and historians study artifacts to find more about history.
Was grain stored in the pyramids?
Some researchers believe that grain was indeed stored in the pyramids, specifically in the pyramid complex at Giza. However, this theory is debated among historians and archaeologists, with others suggesting the pyramids were used for the burial of pharaohs. More research is needed to draw a definitive conclusion.
What are the advantages of archaeology as a source of history?
Archaeology provides tangible evidence of past human activity through artifacts, structures, and landscapes, offering a more concrete understanding of history. It can fill gaps in written records or provide insights into everyday life of common people. Additionally, archaeology can help to challenge or confirm historical narratives based on physical evidence rather than subjective interpretations.
Who was the explorer that discovered st Elmo and fire?
The explorer who discovered St. Elmo's fire was Christopher Columbus. He encountered this phenomenon during one of his voyages to the New World and documented it in his writings.
How did Historians get their information from the founding of the Byzantine Empire 330AD?
They get the information from the writings of ancient Roman historians.
What evidence shows that Phoenicia existed?
The writings of contemporary historians.
Why do historians study the Dead Sea Scrolls?
these writings helped the historians learn about the lives of many jews during this time
Why do historians study Dead Sea Scroll?
these writings helped the historians learn about the lives of many jews during this time
Why do archaeologist and historians try to find artifacts and writings from ancient civilizations?
answer Answer this question…
Did Marco Polo lie about his adventure?
There is debate among historians about the accuracy of Marco Polo's accounts. Some believe that he exaggerated certain details or included fictional elements, while others argue that his writings are largely reliable. It is difficult to determine the truth with certainty, but Polo's writings continue to be studied and analyzed for insights into the history and cultures of the time.
What has the author COLIN SACKETT written?
COLIN SACKETT has written: 'ENGLISH PUBLISHING: COLIN SACKETT; WRITINGS AND READINGS, 1991-2002'
How many readings are in the Liturgy of the Word?
There are three for Sundays and solemn feast days- one from the Old Testament, one from the writings of the apostles, and one from the Gospel. The Second Reading (From the writings of the apostles) is left out on Weekday Masses.
Is it logical to assume that colonial and nationalist historians were both willing scribes?
Colonial historians and nationalists were not prisoners because their writings were examined by the ruling class so it was difficult for them to write what was exactly happened.
Historians value the writings of Marco Polo and Ibn Battuta because they?
They both served as primary sources about trade and culture.
What explains one way historians know that Hinduism has basis in religion of the ancient aryans?
They both share the same sacred writings.
What are the limitations of the sources of history?
What is known about ancient history is based on sources and it can be expected that these sources are limited if only because of the time an ancient historical event happened and the present day. Nevertheless, here are the source limitations faced by historians in their studies:A. Ancient historical writings about history may have been written hundreds of years after the historian begins a record. In dealing with the writings of the ancients it must be remembered that they did not have the resources that modern day historians have, such as carbon dating and a vast network of "finds" based on modern archeology. Therefore the accuracy of ancient historians can be called into question;B. While modern historians can rely on archaeologists with scientific data to assist them, they are limited, because of time, to explain "cultural" facts that may have influenced the ancient writers;C. Modern historians must base much of their writings upon the records of ancient historians, which may be inaccurate. By the same token, the same problem confronted the ancient historians as they too must rely on earlier writers;D. Historians, both modern and ancient, understand that the sources of previous writers may be prejudicial. This may be the result, for example of a writer in the time of Julius Caesar. If the historian favors the deeds of a Caesar, the historical records may not be totally accurate;E. Since we have Caesar here, his own writings on his conquests in Gaul must always be seen as a man writing about his own history. Thus the source can be questioned;F. Conflicting historical writings can always exist. The historian reviewing these faces another source limitation;G. Lack of historical records. The ancient Egyptians have left no blueprints on building pyramids. Scholars, archeologists, and engineers and others still speculate how they were built; andH. Myths. Historians are frequently faced with ancient historians who may have based their writings on "myths". For all practical purposes, as one example, the founding of ancient Rome is dated at 753 BC, this is an educated guess. It may also be termed a myth, thus the historian is faced with another limited source.
