answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

What is known about ancient history is based on sources and it can be expected that these sources are limited if only because of the time an ancient historical event happened and the present day. Nevertheless, here are the source limitations faced by historians in their studies:

A. Ancient historical writings about history may have been written hundreds of years after the historian begins a record. In dealing with the writings of the ancients it must be remembered that they did not have the resources that modern day historians have, such as carbon dating and a vast network of "finds" based on modern archeology. Therefore the accuracy of ancient historians can be called into question;

B. While modern historians can rely on archaeologists with scientific data to assist them, they are limited, because of time, to explain "cultural" facts that may have influenced the ancient writers;

C. Modern historians must base much of their writings upon the records of ancient historians, which may be inaccurate. By the same token, the same problem confronted the ancient historians as they too must rely on earlier writers;

D. Historians, both modern and ancient, understand that the sources of previous writers may be prejudicial. This may be the result, for example of a writer in the time of Julius Caesar. If the historian favors the deeds of a Caesar, the historical records may not be totally accurate;

E. Since we have Caesar here, his own writings on his conquests in Gaul must always be seen as a man writing about his own history. Thus the source can be questioned;

F. Conflicting historical writings can always exist. The historian reviewing these faces another source limitation;

G. Lack of historical records. The ancient Egyptians have left no blueprints on building pyramids. Scholars, archeologists, and engineers and others still speculate how they were built; and

H. Myths. Historians are frequently faced with ancient historians who may have based their writings on "myths". For all practical purposes, as one example, the founding of ancient Rome is dated at 753 BC, this is an educated guess. It may also be termed a myth, thus the historian is faced with another limited source.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the limitations of the sources of history?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the limitations of the unconventional sources of energy?

There are different types of "unconventional sources"; each has its own benefits and limitations.


Name the different sources of history?

name the sources of history


What are the limitation of unconventional sources of energy?

There are different types of "unconventional sources"; each has its own benefits and limitations.


Discuss the sources and uses for reconstruction of history?

what are the importance of sources of history to the reconstruction of history


What is the name for an argument about history that is supported by sources?

Interpretation is the name for an argument about history that is supported by sources.


What has the author Brahmadeva Prasad Ambashthya written?

Brahmadeva Prasad Ambashthya has written: 'Non-Persian sources on Indian medieval history' -- subject(s): History, Sources 'Non-Persian sources of Indian medieval history' -- subject(s): History, Sources


Debate on literary sources are more useful than archelogical sources for writing history?

literary sources are more useful than archaeological sources for writing history


Compare and contrast archaeology and ethinography as sources of history?

Archaeology involves studying material remains to understand past societies, while ethnography involves studying present-day cultures through participant observation and interviews. Both provide valuable insights into different aspects of history, with archaeology focusing on material culture and physical landscapes, and ethnography focusing on social practices and beliefs. Combining findings from both fields can offer a more comprehensive understanding of past and present societies.


Importance of history and it's sources of history?

Its important to learn history because it helps us understand our future and know what to do. Sources of history try a history book or hisstory class.


What has the author Akram Fouad Khater written?

Akram Fouad Khater has written: 'Sources in the history of the modern Middle East' -- subject(s): History 'Sources in the history of the modern Middle East' -- subject(s): Sources, History


Sources used to study history?

1.archaeologyical sources 2.literacy sources


What are strengths and weakness of oral sources in history?

what are weakness of oral sources