Want this question answered?
Autoclaving is more efficient than boiling because it has a hotter temperature. This is sure to clean the tools correctly by sterilizing and remove all germs.
Because then they are colder and their energy is conserved more as the outside world should (!) be warmer than a freezer.
Digital ballast are much more efficient and more reliable than the traditional transformer ballasts. Digital ballasts are more efficient at producing light than a transformer ballasts. The digitals also run much cooler than transformers and are much more silent. Though some user may enjoy the transformers more, digital ballasts are more popular and are sold more often online. Yes, a ballast transformers has two special secondary windings to provide the proper low current. Also, Ballasts can operate more than one type of lamp.
No, Plants are not more efficient. Animals are more efficient because they coordinate by hormones and CNS ( Central Nervous System ). But plants coordinate only by hormones, therefore animals are more efficient.
it is...... the thing that is on the moon
Manufacturing fossil fuel energy is much less efficient than manufacturing _____.
Yes, much more efficient.Yes, much more efficient.Yes, much more efficient.Yes, much more efficient.
Manufacturing fossil fuel energy is much less efficient than manufacturing _____.
Any angle less than 90o will have a complement.
No, modern ones are much more efficient.
Since there are more than 20 different types of complement, the disease that results depends on the specific complement that is lacking.
Amphibian lungs do not have to be as efficient as gills because there is much more oxygen in air than in water.
an angle that is 54 degrees less than 4 times its complement
The are much more efficient than the ones from brfore...... the are much safer and can last longer :) Hope that helps :P
30% i work for them
The angle is 50 and its compliment is 40.
It sprays water over the top of the plants, similar to a gentle shower. Not as efficient as drip irrigation, but much more efficient than flood or furrow irrigation.