Because it is a corporations nature to lie.
You should be skeptical about his claim.
He claims to be a "brand new man" after completing the treatment program, but his family is pretty skeptical. The ad for the diet pills says that you can loose 10 pounds in two days, but I'm extremely skeptical about that claim.
A skeptical tone conveys doubt or disbelief towards a particular subject or claim. It often involves questioning the validity or truthfulness of information and may indicate a lack of trust in the sources or evidence presented.
The word you're looking for is "skeptical." It describes a state of doubt or questioning regarding the truth or validity of a claim or belief. A skeptical person often seeks evidence or reasoning before accepting something as true.
H
For a scientist's claim to be considered valid, it must be based on empirical evidence gathered through systematic observation, experimentation, or research. The claim should be reproducible, meaning that other researchers can obtain similar results under similar conditions. Additionally, it should be peer-reviewed and withstand scrutiny from the scientific community, ensuring that it adheres to established methodologies and ethical standards.
You cannot insure a vehicle that does not belong to you. The same for insurer, they cannot sell something that does not belong to them. Vehicle is policyholders under settlement of claim. When policyholder cashes settlement cheque, then becomes insurers property.
scientist deals with the physicals world so all claim are subject to indepent experimentalverification and peer review for agreement with the established body of evidence
"உச்சமாக கேட்கலாமா?" is the translation for "should you claim?" in Tamil.
if you have comprehensive coverage, most cases yes, some companys/policys have exclusions for the 'keys in the car' thefts, but most do not.....check turn in the claim.......
Best advice is to seek out one via you local business directory and then ask for quotes. Companys posting in chat room will always claim to be the best which is not necessarily the true.
to corroborate a given primary source's claim about an event