Because all three of those types of organisms need energy
because without a producer there is no ecosystem
Because all three of those types of organism needed energy
I think there are supposed to be an equal amount as well as plants the herbivores eat. This is to maintain an equilibrium so no side makes the other extinct. I think this holds true to the point of an outside factor. Weather killing a large amount of plants could affect an ecosystem by having a lack of food for the herbivores. They may die off leaving little to no food for the carnivores. I think it's all about equilibrium so there should not be more carnivores than herbivores and vice versa.
Photosynthetic plants. They go through a process called photosynthesis where water, carbon dioxide and the sun's light energy is used to produce oxygen and glucose (sugar). Herbivores (consumers) then eat plants to obtain this source of energy to maintain their own lives which they are eventually (maybe) eaten by a carnivore (consumer) So if plants didn't exist nor could herbivores and carnivores.
Most of all without producers, all other organisms would die: because the consumers would not be able to eat the producer, and then the predators who are at the top of the food chain, would have no source of food, which would lead to the death of all organisms. Producers are most definitely vital to life, and is of great importance to the existence of living organisms ..<3 ChellyWellyBellyFrom Belize :)15 years old.
The maximum population that an ecosystem can maintain.
. My name is Freddy Bob Jr.
I think there are supposed to be an equal amount as well as plants the herbivores eat. This is to maintain an equilibrium so no side makes the other extinct. I think this holds true to the point of an outside factor. Weather killing a large amount of plants could affect an ecosystem by having a lack of food for the herbivores. They may die off leaving little to no food for the carnivores. I think it's all about equilibrium so there should not be more carnivores than herbivores and vice versa.
by safeguarding that the producers i.e. plants don't have too much stress put on them by the herbavores
Photosynthetic plants. They go through a process called photosynthesis where water, carbon dioxide and the sun's light energy is used to produce oxygen and glucose (sugar). Herbivores (consumers) then eat plants to obtain this source of energy to maintain their own lives which they are eventually (maybe) eaten by a carnivore (consumer) So if plants didn't exist nor could herbivores and carnivores.
describe the parts of an ecosystem and tell how they maintain the system's balance
They maintain biodiversity.
describe the parts of an ecosystem and tell how they maintain the system's balance
No,because consumers maintain a proper ecosystem,food web .
Most of all without producers, all other organisms would die: because the consumers would not be able to eat the producer, and then the predators who are at the top of the food chain, would have no source of food, which would lead to the death of all organisms. Producers are most definitely vital to life, and is of great importance to the existence of living organisms ..<3 ChellyWellyBellyFrom Belize :)15 years old.
Most organisms serve a purpose in their selected environments, with the exception of a select few that could be disputed(mosquitos). One of birds many roles is to serve the purpose of dispersing the seeds of vegetables and fruit that they eat so the plant can become more widespread and abundant. Most herbivores help plants out this way actually. Furthermore, herbivores are fed upon by carnivores. Allowing the carnivores to continue their life cycles as well. Ultimately, our environment depends on these animals so we can maintain a healthy existence as well. How would you like to live in a land without trees, grass, bullfrogs and cats? They all play a part in a much larger picture, and this is why their existence needs to be maintained.
they maintain the ecosystem
It uses luke bradleys forehead
The maximum population that an ecosystem can maintain.