0
Cells are considered evidence for evolution because they contain genetic information that can be compared across different species, revealing similarities and differences that reflect evolutionary relationships. By studying the similarities in cell structure and function between different species, scientists can trace the evolutionary history of life on Earth. Additionally, the process of cell division and genetic mutation provides mechanisms for genetic variation and the generation of new traits, which drive evolution over time.
What else can I help you with?
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be ibdirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct observation of evolutionary changes happening over time. Instead, it relies on comparing similarities and differences in biochemistry, such as DNA sequences or protein structures, to infer evolutionary relationships among organisms.
What kind of evidence from evolution best supports all the others?
The evidence from the fossil record is considered the strongest support for other forms of evidence in evolution. Fossils provide a physical record of past organisms, showing changes over time and the relationships between different species. This evidence complements genetic, anatomical, and embryological evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding of evolutionary processes.
What is true of the evolution of cells?
As populations of organisms evolve, different properties of their cell membranes are selected for or against.
Why was evolution considered a theory?
Evolution is considered a scientific theory because it is a well-supported explanation of how species change over time through natural selection. In science, a theory is an explanation that has been rigorously tested, supported by evidence, and can make accurate predictions about the natural world. Evolution meets these criteria, hence it is considered a solid scientific theory.
What biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?
Biological molecules are considered evidence for evolution include a. DNA b. amino acids c. porteins d. all of the above Answer: D. All of the above
Biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?
Go to google and not to answer.com
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
How is fossil evidence of evolution dissproved?
Fossil evidence of evolution is not typically disproved, as fossils are considered crucial pieces of evidence in supporting the theory of evolution. However, the interpretation of fossil evidence can sometimes be open to debate or revision based on new discoveries or scientific understanding. Overall, the accumulation of diverse fossil evidence provides strong support for the concept of evolution and the relatedness of different species.
What cell theory contradicts evolution?
Cell theory does not contradict evolution. Cell theory states that all living organisms are composed of cells, while evolution explains how these cells and organisms change over time through the process of natural selection. Both concepts are supported by scientific evidence and are compatible with each other.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be ibdirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct observation of evolutionary changes happening over time. Instead, it relies on comparing similarities and differences in biochemistry, such as DNA sequences or protein structures, to infer evolutionary relationships among organisms.
Why is evolution considered a theory and not a hypothesis or a law?
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
Homology is evidence of what?
Evolution
Why can't intelligence be evidence of evolution?
Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.
What kind of evidence from evolution best supports all the others?
The evidence from the fossil record is considered the strongest support for other forms of evidence in evolution. Fossils provide a physical record of past organisms, showing changes over time and the relationships between different species. This evidence complements genetic, anatomical, and embryological evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding of evolutionary processes.
What is true of the evolution of cells?
As populations of organisms evolve, different properties of their cell membranes are selected for or against.
What is the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to what evidence?
In evolution the study of vertebrate forelimbs is related to the anatomical evidence from homology.
