Civil wars are bad for the economy because the nation is fighting itself. Crops are destroyed. Homes are destroyed. And when its all said and done the victor has to reincoporate the other side back in. That means using an already over burdened national treasury to get people back on their feet.
Second response
The North's economy boomed during the US Civil War.
Their Economy Flourished.
Because the Opium wars left China in debt and they had a hard time recovering.
a social market economy
The house you are staying, the road on which you travel, are all just minor parts of civil engineering; you can now imagine its importance in economy. It is the driver of economy.
The South's economy was devastated after the US Civil War. As a summary statement, for a forty year period after the Civil War, the economy of the South was stagnated, and two thirds of its wealth was destroyed.
bad.
The economy wasn't just bad then, but it still is. I'm not sure why, but it really is. People are saving money which are making businesses close and people losing their jobs which is really bad. I think what makes the economy bad is that we are serving in two wars! So, the soldiers' weapons are being paid for!
The Civil Wars was created in 2009.
Sometimes, but most of the time it's the wars that effect the economy.
The biggest problem is the constant civil wars, but the country has an economy that currently mostly consists of cash crops.
Argentine Civil Wars happened in 1814.
Sulla's civil wars happened in -88.
There have been civil wars in Africa and several asian countries
Throughout history almost every country has had its civil wars.
Eritrean Civil Wars happened in 1972-02.
Because they fought in so many wars was that the reason is the other people they fought with was doing something bad to them first so the declared a war and that is why.
the economy is a very bad system