0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does Madison believe is the best way to deal with factions?
Create a large enough republic to ensure that majority factions will
Which document emphasizes that a large republic will be more immune to factions than a small republic?
Federalist 10 by James Madison
James madison wrote about a concern of factions in?
James Madison wrote about his concern regarding factions in his famous essay, "The Federalist No. 10." He believed that factions, or groups of individuals united by a common interest or opinion, were a natural and inevitable part of human nature. Madison argued that the danger of factions lied in their potential to oppress the rights of others or undermine the public good, but that a large and diverse republic with multiple factions could help control their effects through a system of checks and balances.
Where does Madison write factions?
Check out the Federalist papers, in particular No. 10. Factions are like political parties or large groups together for a cause.
Why did James Madison believe that a large republic would be best for the common goods?
James Madison believed that a large diverse republic would be the best for the common good because diverse interests could check one another.
A large area controlled by one town?
A large area controlled by one town is a city-state.
What is a large area controlled by one town?
A large area controlled by one town is called a city-state.
Why electromagnets over permanent magnets for a large dc machine?
The flux density of an electromagnet can be easily controlled. It's also easy and cheap to produce a large flux density with an electromagnet which is necessary for such large dc motors. Permanent magnets are generally expensive. For such a large motor,a very large permanent magnet will be needed for that motor which will not be ideal.AnswerElectromagnets are more powerful than temporary magnets, and -as pointed out above- their flux density can be controlled.
In the federalist paper No10 what is a faction and why must it be controlled?
Of all the Federalist Papers written by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton, perhaps the most famous and the one most quoted is Federalist No. 10, by Madison. Many people had argued against the new Constitution claiming that the US would be too large to govern as a democracy (republic) and had too many groups, or “factions,” as political parties were then called. While Madison acknowledged that there were many differing factions, he also indicated that a democratic form of government, using the ideal of majority rule, would tame the factions and cause them to work together as much as possible. He claimed that the republican form of government created by the new Constitution would allow all the factions the room and venues to express themselves and to influence the workings of government by getting their members elected and/or appointed to offices. Minority groups would be protected because the factions would have to negotiate their differences. In this way, the republic would create a system of government in which the majority would rule but the ideas of the minority would have to be taken into consideration. Numerous factions would also mean that no one group would be able to take complete control of the government and this would give rise to what Madison called “politics,” namely, the art of governing.
Why is a large republic better at controlling factions than a small one?
In Federalist 10, while Madison acknowledged that there were many differing factions, he also indicated that a democratic form of government, using the ideal of majority rule, would tame the factions and cause them to work together as much as possible. He claimed that the republican form of government created by the new Constitution would allow all the factions the room and venues to express themselves and to influence the workings of government by getting their members elected and/or appointed to offices. Minority groups would be protected because the factions would have to negotiate their differences. In this way, the republic would create a system of government in which the majority would rule but the ideas of the minority would have to be taken into consideration. Numerous factions would also mean that no one group would be able to take complete control of the government and this would give rise to what Madison called "politics," namely, the art of governing.
Why does Madison reject pure democracy in favor of representative democracy?
Madison believed that pure democracy could lead to tyranny of the majority, where the majority could easily oppress the rights of the minority. Representative democracy, on the other hand, allows for the selection of individuals to represent the interests of the people while providing checks and balances to prevent such tyranny.
Why can't factions be eliminated?
Factions are a right given to the people under the constitution. Factions play a part in the groups belief to improve the lifestyle of the people. Others create a life style away from the general beliefs as is their right in protest or for religious reasons. To eliminate factions is to propose a single entity of the government away from democratic ideals and into autocratic government.
