Many people had argued against the new Constitution claiming that the US would be too large to govern as a democracy (republic) and had too many groups, or “factions,” as political parties were then called. While Madison acknowledged that there were many differing factions, he also indicated that a democratic form of government, using the ideal of majority rule, would tame the factions and cause them to work together as much as possible. He claimed that the republican form of government created by the new Constitution would allow all the factions the room and venues to express themselves and to influence the workings of government by getting their members elected and/or appointed to offices. Minority groups would be protected because the factions would have to negotiate their differences. In this way, the republic would create a system of government in which the majority would rule but the ideas of the minority would have to be taken into consideration. Numerous factions would also mean that no one group would be able to take complete control of the government and this would give rise to what Madison called “politics,” namely, the art of governing.
Direct Democracy is established on the basis of voters, there are no representatives that "make" your vote in legislature. Votes depend on the outcome of voters and their decisions, not the decisions of representatives elected by the people. Direct democracy usually only works in smaller populations of people. Like in Switzerland, for instance, they're probably the best example of a direct democracy. In the United States we have a representative democracy, we elect officials to make decisions that are supposed to be in our favor.
Because educated people can understand their rights and duties.
Moral diplomacy means that the US government should prioritize promoting ethical values and principles in its foreign relations, such as human rights, democracy, and peace. It involves using moral persuasion and diplomatic tools to advance these values in interactions with other countries.
This quote is often attributed to French philosopher and economist Alexis de Tocqueville, although there is no definitive evidence that he actually said or wrote these exact words. The sentiment is commonly used to critique government spending and the risks of politicians using public funds to gain favor with voters.
They shape public opinions.Interest groups are group of identified persons who may or may not be in favor of a specific policy and hence in the former tries to convince the public to accept but in the latter incite the public to refute such policy.
As part of the United States, and not being a city-state in ancient Greece, Madison, WI, tends toward elected positions (indirect democracy). Also, when I lived in Madison I observed many stickers that told me to vote Feingold, who would then presumably go on to vote on the issues. This is further evidence that Madison favors indirect democracy.
The Founding Fathers were not in favor of direct democracy. In fact, some, like Alexander Hamilton, actually favored something on the lines of a constitutional monarchy. The majority of delegates to the Constitutional Convention favored a form of democracy we know as representative democracy. You will note that the original Constitution provides only the House of Representatives to be elected by the people. The President was chosen by the Electoral College and Senators were appointed by their state legislatures. A representative democracy works better in a large nation. Direct or "true" democracy works well in small nations. An example of direct democracy today might be town meetings held in small towns in New England.
They did favor Republic. That's why neither in Decleration of Independence or The constitution itslef the word Democracy is never mentioned .
To vote
Jefferson and Washington were both in favor of a Bill of Rights, as well as James Madison.
for majority rule
james madison
all of these early leaders were in favor of the Constitution except James Madison or Patrick Henry or Alexander Hamilton or George Washington?
no
the competry is not beable
democracy had only proved to slow government and governing down and had just led to the rise of the next would-be dictator.
Lenin shifted in favor of a transition between Tsarism and democracy.