yes medical records are confidential due to the sake of the patient's privacy
Medical records belong to the patient, not the doctor and remain confidential regardless of the doctor's financial condition.
Medical records are confidential. They should only be released after the patient has signed a release form.
No, electronic medical records are not available to the public. Anyone's medical records are completely confidential and restricted to the doctor and patient unless other permissions are given by the patient. Patient Portal is a product offered by CureMD with the EMR which is actually for the patients and doctors to check and maintain medical records from anywhere.
Yes, billing information is protected health information covered under HIPAA regulations.
form_title=Moving Medical Records form_header=Protect your medical records with confidential and secure moving. Get help moving medical records from qualified moving professionals. Are the items in a particular order?= () Yes () No () Not Sure Do you need a safety file box to move the records? = () Yes () No () Not Sure How many files will you be moving? =_ Are the items backed up in case of theft or fire? = () Yes () No () Not Sure
For as long as she is alive. However the records should be confidential between the girl and those medics directly treating her now and in the future; they are her property. The medical records should be available to inform medics regarding her past medical history when treating any medical conditions she may have later in life.
form_title=Medical Records Storage form_header=Keep the clutter away! Store your medical records in a safe and confidential place. How frequently do you need acess to these records? =_ How many records will need to be moved? =_ How long will you want to store these items? = {(),1 to 3 months,3 to 6 months,6 to 9 months,9 to 12 months,More than a year} What date will you need them moved by? =_
Because he has no legal right to them. He isn't her husband, her legal guardian, or her doctor. Medical records are confidential, to protect the patient's privacy. (That means Mr. Rove's are confidential too-- a curious reporter concerned about Mr. Rove's sudden weight gain, for example, could not see the records of his physical exam without his permission.) There is no reason why Mr. Rove should have access to Hillary Clinton's confidential medical records, since he is not treating her for any illnesses. It should also be noted that not releasing one's medical records does not mean a person has something to hide. Most presidential candidates do release the results of their physical exams, but candidates have every right to keep certain records confidential. Further, it should be noted that Karl Rove is a Republican political operative. His job is to create doubt about Democrats. There is no credible evidence that Hillary Clinton is seriously ill, but Rove's job is to make you think she is. It's sad, but that's politics.
No. A person's medical records are considered extremely private and confidential. Even if a person wants a copy of their own medical records sent from one doctor to another they have to sign consent forms for their doctor to send them to the second doctor.
No, these are permanent and confidential records
Yes, the patient and doctor relationship and medical records are private and confidential. They may be released to appropriate law enforcement agencies if needed as well as to insurance companies for billing purposes.