Want this question answered?
I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
Because it shows that that species' ancestors walked on legs, but due to evolution their legs are no longer needed and recede over generations.
how does adaptations give evidence for evolution?
fossils
cause of county affirs
Biological molecules are considered evidence for evolution include a. DNA b. amino acids c. porteins d. all of the above Answer: D. All of the above
Go to google and not to answer.com
Vestigial structures are considered evidence, but no more critical than any other line of evidence in Biology and palaeontology. They're considered evidence, not because of their function, but because of the way their morphologies follow the nested hierarchies of biology: the vestigial legs of whales, for instance, have exactly the kind of shape we would have expected them to have if whales had descended from land mammals. The same goes for human tailbones and embryonic branchial ridges, the wings of emus, and so on.
I do not know. I can look at shared biochemical pathways and see direct evidence of common ancestry with other organisms.
Indirect evidence refers to information that requires some form of inference or interpretation to establish a connection to a particular fact or conclusion. It does not directly prove a point but rather provides clues or support for a theory or argument. Examples include circumstantial evidence or expert opinions.
It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
Because it shows that that species' ancestors walked on legs, but due to evolution their legs are no longer needed and recede over generations.
Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.
Many species have vestigial structures, especially in the animal kingdom. Two good examples are the vestigial legs in whales and some snakes. This is clear evidence that whales and snakes are descended from creatures that had functional legs. This is strong evidence of evolution, since there is no other plausible explanation, religious or scientific, for vestigial structures.
Evolution