0
Vestigial structures are considered critical evidence of evolution because they are remnants of organs or structures that have lost their original function through the process of evolution. These structures provide insights into an organism's evolutionary history and support the idea that species have changed over time. The presence of vestigial structures suggests that organisms have inherited traits from their ancestors, even if those traits are no longer useful.
What else can I help you with?
What are the three roots of science evolution?
The three roots of science evolution are empirical observations and experimentation, logical reasoning and critical thinking, and the constant revision of theories based on new evidence and data.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be ibdirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct observation of evolutionary changes happening over time. Instead, it relies on comparing similarities and differences in biochemistry, such as DNA sequences or protein structures, to infer evolutionary relationships among organisms.
What kind of evidence from evolution best supports all the others?
The evidence from the fossil record is considered the strongest support for other forms of evidence in evolution. Fossils provide a physical record of past organisms, showing changes over time and the relationships between different species. This evidence complements genetic, anatomical, and embryological evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding of evolutionary processes.
Why was evolution considered a theory?
Evolution is considered a scientific theory because it is a well-supported explanation of how species change over time through natural selection. In science, a theory is an explanation that has been rigorously tested, supported by evidence, and can make accurate predictions about the natural world. Evolution meets these criteria, hence it is considered a solid scientific theory.
What biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?
Biological molecules are considered evidence for evolution include a. DNA b. amino acids c. porteins d. all of the above Answer: D. All of the above
Biological molecules that are considered evidence for evolution include?
Go to google and not to answer.com
What are the three roots of science evolution?
The three roots of science evolution are empirical observations and experimentation, logical reasoning and critical thinking, and the constant revision of theories based on new evidence and data.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be indirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct evidence of specific evolutionary events or transitions in the fossil record. Instead, it demonstrates similarities in molecular structures or sequences across different species, which support the idea of a common ancestor but do not directly show the process of evolution occurring.
Why is evolution misleading?
Evolution is not inherently misleading; it is a fundamental concept in biology supported by extensive evidence. Misunderstandings or misconceptions about evolution may arise from incomplete or incorrect information, personal beliefs, or deliberate misinformation. It is important to rely on scientific evidence and critical thinking to understand the complexities of evolution accurately.
How is fossil evidence of evolution dissproved?
Fossil evidence of evolution is not typically disproved, as fossils are considered crucial pieces of evidence in supporting the theory of evolution. However, the interpretation of fossil evidence can sometimes be open to debate or revision based on new discoveries or scientific understanding. Overall, the accumulation of diverse fossil evidence provides strong support for the concept of evolution and the relatedness of different species.
Why is biochemical evidence of evolution considered to be ibdirect?
Biochemical evidence of evolution is considered indirect because it does not provide direct observation of evolutionary changes happening over time. Instead, it relies on comparing similarities and differences in biochemistry, such as DNA sequences or protein structures, to infer evolutionary relationships among organisms.
Why are vestigial structures considered critical evidence of evolution?
Vestigial structures are considered evidence, but no more critical than any other line of evidence in Biology and palaeontology. They're considered evidence, not because of their function, but because of the way their morphologies follow the nested hierarchies of biology: the vestigial legs of whales, for instance, have exactly the kind of shape we would have expected them to have if whales had descended from land mammals. The same goes for human tailbones and embryonic branchial ridges, the wings of emus, and so on.
Why is evolution considered a theory and not a hypothesis or a law?
In science, a hypothesis and a theory differs in that a hypothesis is a conjecture based on empirical observation or theoretical derivation yet unproven or by any experimental work, and that a theory is a hypothesis that has been rigorously tested by many researchers and supported by strong evidence. Evolution is a theory that has been repeatedly tested, supported by overwhelming evidence, and can be used to explain natural phenomenon very well.
Homology is evidence of what?
Evolution
Why can't intelligence be evidence of evolution?
Intelligence is merely a property of some lifeforms. It has no direct relationship to evolution and can say nothing either way, although the apparent development of intelligence combined with otehr mechanisms (e.g. suitability, usefulness) may be considered evidence.
What kind of evidence from evolution best supports all the others?
The evidence from the fossil record is considered the strongest support for other forms of evidence in evolution. Fossils provide a physical record of past organisms, showing changes over time and the relationships between different species. This evidence complements genetic, anatomical, and embryological evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding of evolutionary processes.
