viruses, in the first place, are non living. when they enter a substrate (e.g. host), that's the time they exhibit actions and processes pertaining to a living organism. this is also the reason why putting viruses in the classification system is still on debate.
Active (non-killed) viruses are living organisms.
Viruses are not living things. Viruses are complicated assemblies of molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, and carbohydrates, but on their own they can do nothing until they enter a living cell. Without cells, viruses would not be able to multiply. Therefore, viruses are not living things.
Yes. Viruses are living things too.
It is because viruses are not made up of cells
They arent alive
viruses, in the first place, are non living. when they enter a substrate (e.g. host), that's the time they exhibit actions and processes pertaining to a living organism. this is also the reason why putting viruses in the classification system is still on debate.
viruses are non living and bacteria are living organisms
viruses do not grow, and viruses do not respond to changes in their environment. Therefore, viruses are not living organisms. All living things reproduce, but Viruses need living cells to reproduce because Viruses cannot reproduce by themselves.
There actually living
Viruses are not classified into any of the kingdoms because they cannot live outside of a host cell (they depend on the host cell's DNA to reproduce and undergo metabolic reactions within it).
Viruses depend on living cells because they reproduce inside of them.
not on viruses though because viruses arent "alive" they are not living creatures, they are inanimate objects and other words for not alive
Viruses need living cells to produce more viruses. They are obliged to use living cells.
no there arent
Viruses are considered non-living because they do not use 6 of the seven life proceses
Viruses require a living organism to do anything - most especially to reproduce.