Because less neural processing is required and the nerve "circuitry" is much simpler for auditory input than for visual input.
There is no significant difference in boys or girls for visual reactions or auditory reactions. For both genders, visual cues take longer to process than auditory stimuli.
Simple reaction time studies show that RT to auditory stimuli is faster than visual stimuli. This is because the sensory process for light is more neurologically complex than for auditory cues. For light to be processed, it has a longer path to take in the brain, going all the way to the back of the brain to the occipital lobe and then back to the eyes. Auditory stimuli is processed in the ear then sent to the temporal lobe and back to the ear; a relatively shorter distance than the vision pathway. Reaction time to auditory cues in normal, healthy subjects is roughly 180 milliseconds for auditory cues and about 220 milliseconds.
It depends on which responses you are talking about. In the autonomic system of the body that protects if from harm, the first response is quicker and the secondary response is more robust, and that is because it takes longer to involve more systems in the body to be called into action.
petrol vehicles pick up and response to gear changes quicker
To represent the data Graphs give a visual representation of progress (or regress) and they are much quicker and easier to grasp than a boring stack of numbers.
I suggest making flashcards if you are a visual learner. If you are an auditory learner (hearing) than i suggest repeating them out loud or listening to them. If you are an kinetic learner (doing) than i suggest that you make up some sort of game for them.
What is quicker to NY than by bus.
Quicker Than the Eye was created in 1996.
The transducer (pickup element) has less mass than a dynamic mic, therefore is quicker in response to a change in sound and can detect smaller changes.
107.75
Quicker Than the Eye has 262 pages.
Yes, much quicker.