You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
they are only secientific observations
In general, attractive forces between two bodies are described by laws of nature (such as the law of gravity, Coulomb's Law, etc.) but if you were to describe a previously unknown type of attractive force, that might be a hypothesis which could become a new theory.
A scientific theory is an idea that is supported by a hypothesis. Once the theory is proven to be permanently correct, it is a law or fact.
The relationship is, in order to become a scientific law, you have to have many observations by many different people. If you want to prove it is not a theory, you have to observe it.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
A law cannot become a theory, as laws are higher in scientific hierarchy than theories. Theories may become laws when the evidence for their factuality proves that the theory meets all established requirements set forth by the theory. If at any point in the scientific method a theory is disproven for the criteria that it sets forth, it can never be considered a Law. The hierarchy is thusly: Hypothesis < Theory < Law.
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
You're playing with words ... a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
Answer this question… What can a hypothesis become if it is supported by repeated experimentation?
they are only secientific observations
When they create theory. Then they search for the different proof for proving it. If they succeed then After confirmation the theory become law.
Yes after a long time it can become a law
a theory is explaining how something works, is made or happens and a law is what you can and cant do.
Look up the definition of an "hypothesis" and look up the definition of a "law." Now look at hypotheses are tested. Can a theory ever become law? What are the limiting factors of an hypothesis versus the limitations of a law, and how are each established? Answer those questions, and you will find your answer.
Theories can not become laws, because the purpose of a theory is different from a law.A theory explains a law. The law of gravity states that there is gravity- this is clearly a fact, and is concrete. Einstein's theory of gravity (or whichever theory is currently supported) explains how gravity works. Theories can be replaced if another, better explanation is formed. New theories do not need to be radically different from their predecessors, and can simply be modifications (although if the modification is very slight, it may still be considered the same theory).Laws state that something happens, and theories state why.*note*This is a very quick summary, intended only to answer your question. There are plenty of other details to scientific theory and law, and some pretty interesting court cases that defined them, so consider looking them up.
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of a natural phenomenon that is supported by evidence and can be used to make predictions. It is a broad explanation that may encompass multiple related hypotheses. In contrast, a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistently observed behavior in nature but does not explain the underlying reasons for that behavior. Laws are usually more specific and narrow in scope compared to theories.