The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
The Roman government of the republic could be considered an oligarchy because the power was held by a few tight-knit, wealthy families.
Yes, Rome was an oligarchy. In the Early Republic the consulship (the office of the two heads of the Republic) and the seats of the senate were monopolised by the patrician aristocracy. In the 200-year Conflict of the Orders, between patricians and plebeians (the commoners), the rich plebeians fought for power-sharing and access to the offices of state which were created as the Republic developed and the seats of the senate. They obtained power-sharing with the patricians and were co-opted into a patrician-plebeian oligarchy. They were given equite (cavalryman) status, which was the second highest social rank.
Later, the emperors needed to rely to some extent on the support of the patricians and the equites for their rule. Some relied more on the latter than the former. The power of the patricians diminished when the army became the key political player during the Crisis of the Third Century when the empire came under a great number of attacks form outside and many emperors were men who had risen through the military ranks, instead of aristocrats. Constantine the Great, however, then propped up the status of the aristocracy again.
it was an oligarchy
Govern. by smalll group of people...oligarchy.
An oligarchy
oligarchyOligarchy is the form of government. This is the form that only few people rule.
. The weakness of oligarchy are that they were owned by a company
Rome itself had an oligarchy. It is a political system which has an oligarchy not people. The term means rule by the rich. The oligarchy in Rome was made up by the patricians aristocrats and the entrepreneurial class ob bankers, money lenders and investors in mining and shipping.
Rome was both an oligarchy and a democracy, yet at different times. First, Rome was ruled by kings, then an oligarchy. After that, the people threw out their kings and rich leaders to form a republic, the root of most modern government including the American government. After that, Rome was a dictatorship.
First a monarchy, then a limited democracy, then an oligarchy.
At one time, Rome was ruled solely by kings. As time passed, the government of Rome became an odd mix of a democracy and oligarchy, then an emperorship.
First an oligarchy and then a developing limited democracy.
it was an oligarchy
Govern. by smalll group of people...oligarchy.
no brazil is not a oligarchy
what is the country for oligarchy
Monoarchy is the antonym of oligarchy.
Oligarchy is unlimited.
Oligarchy