We can't say that science is all inclusive because science does not cover religion or anything mystical. We cannot say that there is no doubt in scientific theories because there is doubt in scientific theories.
Because that would be unscientific.
why it is more difficult to develop sound theories in the behavioral sciences than it is to explain phenomena in the natural sciences.
The main branches are the physical sciences and the biological sciences. The physical sciences deal with the natural world we are in, while the biological sciences deal with living organisms. What they have in common is the scientific approach, which makes observations and measurements, forms theories and tests them against the observational evidence. Scientific theories (other than in mathematics) are not provable and a physical theory is judged by its ability to predict what will happen in particular circumstances when compared with observations. All theories can be replaced by better ones if and when they are discovered.
Kurt Walter Schwager has written: 'Theories of measurement in social science' -- subject(s): Social sciences, Methodology, Philosophy
D. E. Weston has written: 'Realism, language and social theories' -- subject(s): Knowledge, Theory of, Philosophy, Political science, Science, Social sciences, Theory of Knowledge
Plant science is not the mother of all sciences, Mathematics is.
a. mathematics b. physical sciences c. earth sciences d. life sciences e.social science
earths sciences,life sciences and physical sciences
science
Earth Science
The Physical Sciences are a branch of Science.
Barry Barnes has written: 'Scientific knowledge' -- subject(s): Science, Philosophy, Psychology, Sciences, Social aspects of Sciences, Social aspects 'The elements of social theory' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Social sciences 'Scientific knowledge and sociological theory' -- subject(s): Knowledge, Sociology of, Science, Social aspects, Social aspects of Science, Sociology, Sociology of Knowledge 'Interests and the growth of knowledge' -- subject(s): Knowledge, Sociology of, Sociology of Knowledge 'Sociological theories of scientific knowledge' 'Science in Context' 'Invitation to the Sciences' 'Understanding agency' -- subject(s): Responsibility, Philosophy, Sociology, Agent (Philosophy) 'The interaction of science and technology'
Philosophy is regal, womanly regal. It was the earliest to develop out of human thoughts. It is considered a mother to all sciences. It in fact spawns sciences. Philosophy attempts speculation on things when science is not able to test them. Philosophy forms hypotheses which, when it becomes equipped enough, Science puts to tests and either proves to theories or discards as fallacies. Philosophy walks in front of science leading it, and progresses through science into newer hypotheses, unsatiatingly. Every science begins as philosophy and ends as art. Leaving her gains to her children, i.e., the sciences, philosophy like a regal queen mother passes on discontentedly to the yet unexplored things which she alone can speculate on.