There would be less glucose produced for respiration.
There would be less glucose produced for respiration.
Chlorophyll is necessary for photosynthesis which will produce sugar. Without sugar as a fuel the plant could not undergo cellular respiration to convert that sugar into a more usable form of energy such as ATP.
Less glucose would be produced for respiration
less glucose will be produced
[object Object]
If a plant lost a significant amount of its chlorophyll, than it couldn't produce as much food for itself as before. Therefor, the plant would have less food it could use in respiration, and thus respiration would decrease. With less respiration, the plant would have less energy, and if the amount of chlorophyll loss was too high, the plant would die.
could cellular respiration happen without photosynthesis explain your reasoning
Yes. Cellular respiration produces ATP, which crickets need so survive, since it is the main way energy is stored in living things. If crickets could not carry out cellular respiration, they would not be alive.
An individual unable to absorb oxygen into the body is called dead, and is unable to perform cellular respiration.
Oxygen serves as the final electron acceptor in the transport system.It is the only oxidized agent strong enough to do this. Without oxygen, cellular respiration could not occur.
There would be less glucose produced for respiration.
Cellular respiration would produce less energy.
If a plant lost a significant amount of its chlorophyll, than it couldn't produce as much food for itself as before. Therefor, the plant would have less food it could use in respiration, and thus respiration would decrease. With less respiration, the plant would have less energy, and if the amount of chlorophyll loss was too high, the plant would die.
could cellular respiration happen without photosynthesis explain your reasoning
Yes. Cellular respiration produces ATP, which crickets need so survive, since it is the main way energy is stored in living things. If crickets could not carry out cellular respiration, they would not be alive.
No, because photosynthesis makes Glucose and cellular respiration breaks down the glucose into Carbon Dioxide and H20 (Water
The glycolysis and the Krebs cycle uses the oxygen to break down the food molecules in order to release energy.
An individual unable to absorb oxygen into the body is called dead, and is unable to perform cellular respiration.
Oxygen serves as the final electron acceptor in the transport system.It is the only oxidized agent strong enough to do this. Without oxygen, cellular respiration could not occur.
They produce glucose which is then used for cellular respiration. (Glucose is chemical energy, it has high energy bonds, which when broken in cellular respiration produce a net of 38 ATP (adenosine triphophate))
Photosynthesis cannot effect a meat eating animal.Photosynthesis has to take place with 3 main things: sun, chlorophyll, and oxygen.Now notice how I said chlorophyll. Meat eating animals do not have chlorophyll. This means the formula of life (or in other words, photosynthesis,) cannot take place.No meat eating animals have anything to do with photosynthesis. Even if it was plant eating animals, they still have nothing to do with photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is for plants only. So photosynthesis cannot effect meat eating animals in ANYWAY.Hope that answered your question.
It either undergoes Anaerobic or Aerobic Cellular Respiration.