Viruses could not be seen because the resolution and magnification was not good enough until 1938 when Ernst Ruska developed the electron microscope.
they are able to multiply, which could be seen as a form of reproduction
viruses
they certainly can be seen
how could you find the name of fish you haven't seen before
Viruses were too small to be seen in a microscope so they were not identified till the 1930s.
Viruses are too small to be seen directly with a light microscope.Can be seen when it's examined under an electron microscope
Only the largest of viruses (e.g. Pox viruses) can be seen with a good light microscope (albeit with poor detail). Viruses usually can only be seen by electron microscopy. [2nd year Dental student, Naser]
Many bacteria and viruses need time to multiply before any signs and symptoms can be seen.
Viruses are too small for van Leeuwenhoek to have seen with his simple microscope.
Viruses are too small, and can't be seen in an optic microscope.
Viruses are incredibly small - much smaller than the smallest of bacteria, even though many millions of bacteria could fit on a pinhead. Therefore viruses can only be seen with the help of a very powerful microscope such as a scanning ellectron microscope.
Yes, bacteria can be seen under a light microscope as they are larger than viruses. However, viruses are much smaller and cannot be seen with a light microscope. Specialized electron microscopes are required to visualize viruses.