Want this question answered?
netherland
Egypt and Tunisia
One party rarely wins a majority of votes.
Proportional representation generally favors smaller parties and allows for more diverse representation compared to winner-takes-all systems. It can help ensure that minority groups or viewpoints are represented in government more fairly.
There are two different proportional representation voting systems with unique strengths and weakness http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/?PageID=482 http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/?PageID=483 Links below show the two systems and on the bottom of each page are their strengths and weakness
Robert A. Newland has written: 'Only half a democracy: why X-voting fails and how preferential voting works' -- subject(s): Proportional representation, Voting 'Electoral systems' -- subject(s): Elections, Proportional representation 'Comparative electoral systems' -- subject(s): Elections
Two
NO
multiparty
The most political parties in a country can vary, but countries like Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany are known to have a high number of political parties due to their proportional representation electoral systems.
Proportional representation can lead to the fragmentation of political parties, as it allows smaller parties to gain representation. This can require parties to form coalitions in order to govern, leading to more complex party structures. Additionally, parties may need to broaden their appeal to attract a wider range of voters in order to secure enough seats in a proportional voting system.
Multiparty systems allow for variation in political discourse, and often tries to unite them all in policy decisions, or at least to make decisions with the majority in mind. Multiparty systems do have one leader, but he or she typically gets input from many other people.