Australia originaly didnt need setlers the people that were the original setlers were there as a means of having a strategic british presence in this area and a great way of getting rid of some of its prisiners. Eventualy Australia's population grew to a point that to get the skills expertise and labour needed to expand beyond a certain point more setlers were needed. This is one of the problems when success is juged by an economy expanding rather then becoming better.
The first settlers arrived in Australia during Australia's mid-Summer.
No, the settlers bought pigs over with them. No animals with hooves were in Australia before the English settlers.
The first settlers in Australia usually came from an English background.
Never.
The very first European settlers in Australia (not including the Aborigines who were the first inhabitants) were a mix of convicts, officers and marines, and free settlers, all of whom came from Britain.
Cows
In 1778.
they arrived at 1793 in Australia
The first European settlers to arrive in Australia were convicts from England, guarded by a large number of marines and officers.
The first European settlers in Australia (specifically New South Wales) were convicts, officers and marines. The convicts were literally the ones who built Australia.
Free settlers came to Australia for two main reasons:unemployment in England forced them to seek a better life in Australianew opportunities were offered in Australia, particularly as many early free settlers were given land grants
The free settlers farmed farms in Australia. Convicts did also