In an age without mechanical transport and electronic communication, it was near impossible to control an empire stretching from the Atlantic to the Middle East, so he tried splitting it into manageable sectors.
Diocletian divided the empire
diocletian divided the empire into the eastern and western empire
diocletian
No, four parts.
Emperor Diocletian divided the Roman empire into a tetrarchy in A.D. 293.
Because it was too large to be ruled in full
Diocletian did not divide the Roman Empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.Diocletian did not divide the Roman empire into eastern and western halves. The division called "east" and "west" was an artificial division concocted by historians in order to clarify their writings. In fact, Diocletian divided the empire into four parts, not two.
He divide the empire into two halves and shared his power with a co-emperor.
Diocletian divided the empire
Diocletian.
The One Responsible For the end of the Roman Empire is Diocletian. Diocletian Ended the Roman Empire By Splitting the Roman Empire Into West and East. Diocletian thought it would make it easier to rule. Diocletian Gave The East to His Trusted Friend. The Empire Fell Because The West Was Captured by different barbaric groups and tribes. The East Turned into The Byzantine Empire With The Capitol City Of Constantinople. The Empire was Successful until the 1400's. The Empire Was Taken Over. And Made Into A Country That Is Now Know As Turkey.
Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.Diocletian was the emperor who divided the Roman empire.