Both betrayed their father, King Henry, but I'd say King Richard, although he didn't hold his position as king for very long.
yes, of course there was. Richard I, Richard Coeur de Lion, Richard the Lionheart; but it's difficult to say that he left for the Crusades, considering that he was already crusading when he became King, and hardly ever visited England at all. Nor was he the manly, tolerant King of robin Hood legend, being an anti-semitic, homosexual psycopath. Ah, well....
some say he murdered his nephews king edward v and his younger brother Richard they were aged 10 & 12 but Henry Tudor had the motive and the opportunity
You cannot say either of those words in Latin.
"Richard"
If you are referring to the parable in Luke 19:12-27, Jesus didn't say those words, "a certain nobleman" did, and since it is a parable, the man who is portrayed as saying those words is not even an actual person. The parable is a depiction of Jesus second coming, so that "nobleman" is Jesus Christ, but only figuratively. And the words "slay them" are just an illustration of the judgement that awaits the enemies of God and His anointed king when He comes.
Those are words but usually when you get to the fourth place you say. "In the fourth place."
I want u and wont take no for an answer
powerful, couragous, non-violent
His father, King George V
Frederick Richard Say was born in 1804.
The word 'with' is a preposition. Pronouns in a prepositional phrase take the objective form, not the subjective. That's the rule of grammar. The easiest way to determine which form is correct, however, is to eliminate the words 'Richard and.' Would you say 'Can you talk with I' or would you say 'Can you talk with me'? Adding 'Richard and' does not change the form of the pronoun.