They did NOT have slavery. Only the south did.
There were no slaves in northern colonies.
The slaves were not needed because the climate was too cold and the Africans worked better in the heat and there were more things to do for the slaves.
well some had slaves and the new England colonies only had a few.
Southern Colonies had slaves to do their work on the plantation, Middle Colonies had some slaves but they were kinda in the middle, while the New England Colonies had no slaves.
The northern colonies had less reliance on plantation agriculture, which required large numbers of slaves, whereas the southern colonies relied heavily on cash crops like cotton and tobacco that necessitated a large labor force. Additionally, the climate and topography of the southern colonies were more conducive to slave labor in agriculture compared to the northern colonies.
In the New England colonies, slaves were often treated harshly and exploited for labor in industries such as fishing, shipping, and agriculture. They faced restrictive laws, limited opportunities for education or freedom, harsh working conditions, and the constant threat of being sold away from their families. Slave codes were enforced to control their movements and limit their rights.
They didn't trade for either. New England and middle colonies didn't have gold or slaves.
Barley any slaves.
In the New England colonies, there were puritans. In the Southern colonies, there were debtors and slaves. In the Middle colonies, there were Quakers and Catholics.
to the northern part of what was the 13 colonies
At some point all 13 colonies had slaves. They were not just owned by rich farmers. Even working class people in the Northern colonies owned slaves.
The English never had slaves like the US. They did in colonies, but not in the homeland.