Want this question answered?
That depends on which tapestry. I'm going to guess you're asking about the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
it is not William godwinson it is William duke of Normandy so i f say the question right then you may get an answer!!! (i did not type the answer above) actually Harold Godwinson was the ruler of England in the time before the battle of Hastings. at the battle of Hastings he was shot in the eye, William took over. end of story. forget both answers above William had around 8,000 troops and so did Harold Harold had thegens fryd and foot soldiers and William had archers and knights :) No he had about 5,000 troops
He didn't and Hastings played no part in the battle. The Saxon King Harold arranged for his army to gather at the "hoar (grey and old) apple tree", a familiar landmark that the men would have known, sited on a ridge which would give the English a defensive high ground position. This was at the place now called Battle, not at Hastings. This ridge at Battle was a very strong position with marshes and ditches in front and around it, commanding the main route from Hastings to London - the route that William had to take. Given sufficient troops, Harold could have held the position indefinitely and William would have lost.
around 9000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 to 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 :-) :-)
The population of Leamington Hastings is 450.
Around 1066, after William won the Battle of Hastings
William first invaded Hastings, then went on to other small town around that part of England.
Hastings was 1066, so I'm guessing around then
The Battle of Hastings lasted only from around 9 am until dusk. William had more men, luck on his side, and the dispute between Harold Godwineson and his brother Tostig to rely on.
That depends on which tapestry. I'm going to guess you're asking about the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the Battle of Hastings in 1066.
it is not William godwinson it is William duke of Normandy so i f say the question right then you may get an answer!!! (i did not type the answer above) actually Harold Godwinson was the ruler of England in the time before the battle of Hastings. at the battle of Hastings he was shot in the eye, William took over. end of story. forget both answers above William had around 8,000 troops and so did Harold Harold had thegens fryd and foot soldiers and William had archers and knights :) No he had about 5,000 troops
He didn't and Hastings played no part in the battle. The Saxon King Harold arranged for his army to gather at the "hoar (grey and old) apple tree", a familiar landmark that the men would have known, sited on a ridge which would give the English a defensive high ground position. This was at the place now called Battle, not at Hastings. This ridge at Battle was a very strong position with marshes and ditches in front and around it, commanding the main route from Hastings to London - the route that William had to take. Given sufficient troops, Harold could have held the position indefinitely and William would have lost.
William generally lived in London as that is the most important city but he travelled around alot and then he stayed with Norman Lords in their castles. It made them go bankrupt but to house the King was a great honour.
around 9000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 to 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 :-) :-)
The population of Leamington Hastings is 450.
He left Normandy, and came to England at Pevencsy(wrong spelling, help!). Then, he started raping and pillaging around Pevencsy until Harold Godwinson couldn't take it anymore.
Because they need to deposit their feces somewhere and they didn't have toilets.