The south wanted to keep slavery to keep their economy going as opposed to doing the right thing and setting salves free. This is how the conflict started!
The southern farms had far more enslaved worker than the Northern farms because the Southern had more land and needed more work done on the plantations.
they loved their faimly
Priority was often given to the slave holder's property rights, and because of this emancipation was spaced out over several slave generations.
The Commerce Compromise addressed the conflict between Northern businessmen and Southern plantation owners over the issue of tariffs.
It applied to the Southern states (over which Lincoln had no authority) and not to the Northern slave states of Kentucky, Missouri and Maryland.
No, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the enslaved persons. Only the slaves in the "rebellious states" were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation. The "rebellious states" were those which had seceded from the Union, except for the states that had already come under Northern control.
The Northern government - because they no longer had to worry about Britain and France aiding the South. (After the Proclamation, it would have made them look as though were pro-slavery.)
Antietam
It was resolved in the 1990s. There is no longer a conflict in Northern Ireland.
this is VERY EASY IT WAS POOH
The southern farms had far more enslaved worker than the Northern farms because the Southern had more land and needed more work done on the plantations.
In the south, white reacted to the proclamation with rage.
He is from Sudan and he rescues children that have been enslaved, usually by northern Arabs.
they loved their faimly
Northern states objected because enslaved people were legally considered property. So, some argued that as property, Slaves should be counted for taxation but not representations.
no, independence increased the conflict in Northern Ireland
The Emancipation Proclamation did not enfranchise the slaves in the northern territories.